You are not logged in You are not logged in to this journal. Log In

LOG IN or SELECT A PURCHASE OPTION:

Hydraulic Performance of Geosynthetic Clay Liners in a Landfill Final Cover

J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133, 814 (2007); http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:7(814) (14 pages)

Craig H. Benson1, Patricia A. Thorstad2, Ho-Young Jo3, and Steven A. Rock4

1Professor and Kellet Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, WI 53706. E-mail: benson@engr.wisc.edu
2Formerly Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706.
3Professor, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Korea Univ., Seoul 136-713 Korea. E-mail: hyjo@korea.ac.kr
4Environmental Engineer, U.S. EPA National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH 45268. E-mail: Rock.Steven@epamail.epa.gov

View MapView Map

(Submitted 3 May 2006; accepted 27 November 2006)

Percolation from a landfill final cover containing a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) as the hydraulic barrier is described. The GCL was covered with 760 mm of vegetated silty sand and underlain with two gravel-filled lysimeters to monitor percolation from the base of the cover. Higher than anticipated percolation rates were recorded in both lysimeters within 4–15 months after installation of the GCL. The GCL was subsequently replaced with a GCL laminated with a polyethylene geofilm on one surface (a “composite” GCL). The composite GCL was installed in two ways, with the geofilm oriented upwards or downwards. Low percolation rates (2.6–4.1 mm/year) have been transmitted from the composite GCL for more than 5 years regardless of the orientation of the geofilm. Samples of the conventional GCL that were exhumed from the cover ultimately had hydraulic conductivities on the order of 5×10−5 cm/s. These high hydraulic conductivities apparently were caused by exchange of Ca and Mg for Na on the bentonite combined with dehydration. The overlying and underlying soils likely were the source of the Ca and Mg involved in the exchange. Column experiments and numerical modeling indicated that plant roots and hydraulic anomalies caused by the lysimeters were not responsible for the high hydraulic conductivity of the GCL. Despite reports by others, the findings of this study indicate that a surface layer 760 mm thick is unlikely to protect conventional GCLs from damage caused by cation exchange and dehydration. Accordingly, GCLs should be used in final covers with caution unless if cation exchange and dehydration can be prevented or another barrier layer is present (geomembrane or geofilm).

© 2007 ASCE

Acknowledgments

Support for the laboratory experiments and field exhumations conducted in this study was provided in part by the United States National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. CMS-9900336. BT2 Inc. and RMT Inc. of Madison, Wis., collected the lysimeter data. Alliant Energy permitted sampling and testing of the GCLs exhumed from the final cover and use of the lysimeter data. Assistance provided by each of these companies is gratefully acknowledged. Stephen Meer conducted some of the laboratory tests and Brian Albrecht assisted with the field work. Their assistance is greatly appreciated.

Article Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. On-Site Materials Characterization
    1. Geosynthetic Clay Liner
    2. Soils
    3. Root Distribution
  3. Discussion of GCL Properties
    1. Hydraulic Conductivity
    2. Exchangeable Cations and Swell Index
    3. Water Content
    4. Onset of Change
  4. Effect of Root Intrusion
  5. Effect of the Lysimeter
  6. Comparison with Other Case Histories
  7. Summary and Conclusion

RELATED DATABASES

To view database links for this article, you need to log in.

ARTICLE DATA

PUBLICATION DATA

ISSN

1090-0241 (print)  
1943-5606 (online)

Publisher


For access to fully linked references, you need to log in.

For access to citing articles, you need to log in.


Figures (8) Tables (8)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)

Access to article objects (figures, tables, multimedia) requires a subscription; log in to view available files.
(Access to supplementary files, where available, is free for this journal.)


Close

close