You are not logged in You are not logged in to this journal. Log In

Proceedings / Volume 217 / Issue 40853 / FORENSIC ENGINEERING PRACTICE (PRACTITIONER TRACK)

LOG IN or SELECT A PURCHASE OPTION:

Benchmarking Forensic Engineering Practice—A Philosophical Discussion

ASCE Conf. Proc. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40853(217)3

Forensic Engineering
Proceedings of Forensic Engineering 2006
S. E. Chen1, D. Young2, D. Weggel3, D. Boyajian4, J. Gergely5, and B. Anderson6

1Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:schen12@uncc.edu
2Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:dyoung@uncc.edu
3Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:dweggel@uncc.edu
4Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:dboyajia@uncc.edu
5Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:ggergely@uncc.edu
6Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223‐000; email:jbanders@uncc.edu

Buy this book

  • Abstract
Recent series of unfortunate events resulted in thousands of damaged/deteriorated structures. To validate insurance claims and rehabilitation efforts and to assist disaster‐worn citizens, a significant amount of forensic engineering work is currently on‐going and will continue for a long time. In the midst of these activities, a significant amount of disputes/mis‐judgements will occur and will cause further difficulties in settling claims and restoring normal operations. To ensure quality of forensic work, this paper attempts to address the more fundamental issue of current forensic science and engineering practices, which adopts an inverse engineering approach whereupon knowledge is accumulated from construction design and post‐event observations. The reasoning process is based on pure deduction with very little in‐between causality evidence. Current approach relies heavily on an engineer's interdisciplinary expertise, training, and reasoning ability, and lacks the fundamental scientific process of elimination of possibilities. It, therefore, often fails to produce complete multidisciplinary solutions to complex forensics problems. This paper attempts to establish quality quantification by suggesting forensic benchmarking such that the involved procedures can be standardized and eliminate the “guess work” still common in an otherwise rapidly developing and highly challenging field.

© 2006 ASCE

KEYWORDS

ASCE SUBJECT HEADINGS

Bench marks, Forensic engineering

ARTICLE DATA

Digital Object Identifier
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40853(217)3

PUBLICATION DATA

ISBN:

978-0-7844-0853-7

Publisher

ASCE

Close

Your Recent History Recent History Help

Recently Viewed

  1. Benchmarking Forensic Engineering Practice—A Philosophical Discussion
  2. Thermal Barriers and Fibre Concrete Roles in the Passive Fire Protection of Tunnels
  3. Seismic Retrofit of a Concrete Immersed Tube Tunnel With Reinforced Shotcrete
  4. A Single Loop Detector Diagnostic: Mode On‐Time Test
  5. Model and Algorithm for Iterative Design of Bus Network
close