Accuracy of Two Stress Update Algorithms for Shear-Free Large Deformation Paths
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 125, Issue 6
Abstract
The behavior of two stress update algorithms for shear-free large deformation paths is analyzed. The first algorithm has a truncation error of order 1. The second algorithm has a truncation error of order 2. As a consequence, the global performance of the second algorithm is clearly superior. However, for the particular case of shear-free deformation paths, the first algorithm correctly predicts null shear stresses, while the second one does not. This behavior was reported in a previous paper for an extension-rotation test. In this note a general shear-free deformation path is considered in full detail.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bathe, K. J., Ramm, E., and Wilson, E. L. ( 1975). “Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis.” Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 9, 353–386.
2.
Pinsky, P. M., Ortiz, M., and Pister, K. S. ( 1983). “Numerical integration of rate constitutive equations in finite deformation analysis.” Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 40, 137–158.
3.
Rodríguez-Ferran, A., Pegon, P., and Huerta, A. ( 1997). “Two stress update algorithms for large strains: Accuracy analysis and numerical implementation.” Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engrg., 40, 4363–4404.
4.
Rodríguez-Ferran, A., and Huerta, A. (1998). “Comparing two algorithms to add large strains to a small strain finite element code.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 124, 939–948.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jun 1, 1999
Published in print: Jun 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.