Sand Shear Band Thickness Measurements by Digital Imaging Techniques
Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 13, Issue 2
Abstract
Digital imaging analysis was used to study localized deformations in granular materials tested under plane strain condition. Two independent techniques were applied and compared. In the first technique, the digitized optical images of a grid printed on the latex membrane were used to measure the shear band orientation angle and thickness, and were found to be 54.5° and 3.01 mm, respectively. The second technique involved introducing an ultra-low viscosity resin into the specimen in preparation for thin-sectioning and microscopic study of the internal fabric. A total of 24 microscopic images obtained from four thin sections were analyzed and void ratio variation was measured. The shear band thickness measurements from images located along the shear band axis (at two locations) were equal to 3.19 and 3.29 mm, which are very close to the average value obtained from surface analysis. The study was then extended to investigate the effects of sand grain-size, specimen density, and confining pressure on shear band thickness. It was found that the normalized shear band thickness decreases as grain-size increases and as density decreases. Finally, shear band thickness is dependent on the specimen dilatancy angle.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Al-Shibli, K., Macari, E., and Sture, S. ( 1996). “Digital imaging techniques for the assessment of homogeneity of granular materials.” Emerging Technologies in Geotechnical Engineering, Transp. Res. Rec., 1526, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 121–128.
2.
Bhatia, S. K., and Soliman, A. F. ( 1990). “Frequency distribution of void ratio of granular materials determined by an image analyzer.” Soils and Foundations, Tokyo, 30(1), 1–16.
3.
Desrues J., Chambon, R., Mokni, M., and Mazerolle, F. ( 1996). “Void ratio evolution inside shear bands in triaxial sand specimens studied by computed tomography.” Géotechnique, London, (3), 529–546.
4.
Han, C., and Drescher, A. ( 1993). “Shear bands in biaxial tests on dry coarse sand.” Soils and Foundations, Tokyo, 33(1), 118–132.
5.
Hilliard, J. E. ( 1968). “Measurement of volume in volume.” Quantitative Microscopy, R. T. DeHoff, and F. N. Rhines, eds., McGraw-Hill, New York.
6.
Kuo, C. Y., and Frost, J. D. (1996). “Uniformity evaluation of cohesionless specimens using digital image analysis.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(5), 390–396.
7.
Lee, K. (1970). “Comparison of plane strain and triaxial tests on sand.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 96(3), 901–923.
8.
Michelland, S., Schiborr, B., Coster, M., Mordike, B., and Chermant, J. ( 1989). “Size distribution of granular materials from unthresholded image.” J. Microscopy, 156(3), 303–311.
9.
Mühlhaus, H., and Vardoulakis, I. ( 1987). ” The thickness of shear bands in granular materials.” Géotechnique, London, 37(3), 271–283.
10.
Peric, D., Runesson, K., and Sture, S. (1992). “Evaluation of plastic bifurcation for plane strain versus axisymmetry.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 118(3), 512–524.
11.
Peric, D., Runesson, K., and Sture, S. (1993). “Prediction of plastic localization using MRS-Lade model.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(4), 639–661.
12.
Peters, J., Lade, P., and Bro, A. ( 1988). “Shear band formation in triaxial and plane strain tests.” Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, ASTM, STP 977, R. Donaghe, R. Chaney, and M. Silver, ed., ASTM, West Conshohoken, Pa., 604–627.
13.
Roscoe, K. ( 1970). “The influence of strains in soil mechanics.” Geótechnique, London, 20(2), 129–170.
14.
Vardoulakis, I., and Graf, B. ( 1985). “Calibration of constitutive models for granular materials using data from biaxial experiments.” Géotechnique, London, 35(3), 299–317.
15.
Vardoulakis, I., Graf, B., and Hettler, A. ( 1985). “Shear band formation in a fine sand.” Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics, Nagoya, Japan, 517–522.
16.
Vardoulakis, I., and Aifantis, E. ( 1991). “A gradient flow theory of plasticity for granular materials.” Acta Mechanica, 87, 197–217.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 13 • Issue 2 • April 1999
Pages: 103 - 109
History
Received: Dec 11, 1998
Published online: Apr 1, 1999
Published in print: Apr 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.