In Situ Determination of Soil Stiffness and Damping
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 124, Issue 8
Abstract
Determination of in situ dynamic soil properties is fundamental to the prediction of the seismic behavior of foundations and soil embankment structures. Both elastic (stiffness) and inelastic (damping) values are required for computational analysis. To be of value to engineers, the geophysical inversion should employ the same soil model as used in the dynamic analysis software. Current engineering practice employs a Kelvin-Voigt model (spring in parallel with dashpot). The relevant wave equation is a third-order partial differential equation. This paper demonstrates how to collect in situ field data and solve for stiffness (scaled shear) and damping values by a method consistent with this constitutive model. Measurements of seismic wave amplitude decay and velocity dispersion are simultaneously inverted for the required stiffness and damping values. These in situ stiffness and damping values are directly comparable to those obtained by resonant column measurements in the laboratory. Furthermore, the results may be directly input into currently available engineering software to provide values of stiffness and viscous damping. This paper includes both synthetic (finite difference) and field data examples that illustrate the method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
ASTM, American Society for Testing and Materials. (1996). “Annual Book of ASTM Standards,” Section 4, Construction, Vol. 4.08 Soil and Rock (I): D420-D4914 ASTM, West Conshohocken, Pa.
2.
Biot, M. A. (1941). “General theory of three-dimensional consolidation.”J. Applied Phys., 12, Feb., 155–164.
3.
Biot, M. A.(1956). “Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated porous solid: I. Low-frequency range.”J. Acoust. Soc. of Am., 28(2), 168–191.
4.
Biot, M. A.(1962). “Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media.”J. Acoust. Soc. of Am., 34(9), 1254–1264.
5.
Cascante, G., and Santamarina, J. C.(1996). “Interparticle contact behavior and wave propagation.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 122(10), 831–839.
6.
Dise, K., Stevens, M. G., and Von Thun, J. L. (1994). “Dynamic compaction to remediate liquefiable embankment foundation soils.”In-Situ Deep Soil Improvement, K. M. Rollins, ed., Geotech. Special Pub. No. 45, ASCE, Reston, Va.
7.
Drnevich, V. P., Hardin, B. O., and Shippy, D. J. (1978). “Modulus and damping of soils by the resonant-column method.”Dyn. Geotech. Testing, Special Tech. Pub. No. 654, Am. Soc. for Testing and Mat., Philadelphia, Pa., 91–125.
8.
Gajo, A.(1995). “Influence of viscous coupling in propagation of elastic waves in saturated soil.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 121(9), 636–644.
9.
Hardin, B. O.(1965). “The nature of damping in sands.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 91(1), 63–97.
10.
Hardin, B. O., and Richart, F. E.(1963). “Elastic wave velocities in granular soils.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 89(1), 33–65.
11.
Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., and Tanaka, Y. (1995). “Shear wave velocity in gravelly soils with different particle gradings.”Static and dynamic properties of gravelly soils, M. D. Evans and R. J. Fragaszy, eds., Geotech. Special Pub. No. 56, ASCE, Reston, Va.
12.
Kudo, K., and Shima, E.(1970). “Attenuation of shear waves in soil.”Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 48, 145–158.
13.
Lee, M. K. W., and Finn, W. D. L. (1982). “Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential.” Rev. Dept. of Civ. Eng., Soil Mech. Series No. 38, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
14.
Lines, L. R., and Evin, F. K., eds. (1988). “Inversion of geophysical data.” Geophys. Reprint Series No. 9, Soc. of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Okla.
15.
Menke, W. (1989). Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
16.
Nazarian, S., and Stokoe, K. H. (1984). “In-situ shear wave velocities from spectral analysis of surface waves.” Proc., 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. 3, 31–38.
17.
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. (1989). Numerical recipes: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass.
18.
Robertson, P. K., Campanella, R. G., Gillespie, D., and Rice, A. (1985). “Seismic CPT to measure in-situ shear wave velocity.”Measurement and use of shear wave velocity for evaluating dynamic soil properties, R. D. Woods, ed., 34–48.
19.
Salgado, R., Drnevich, V. P., Ashmawy, A., Grant, W. P., and Vallenas, P.(1997). “Interpretation of large-strain seismic cross-hole tests.”J. Geotech. and Geoenvir. Engrg., 123(4), 382–388.
20.
Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B. (1972). “SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontal layered sites.”Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr. Report EERC 72-12, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
21.
Sheriff, R. E. (1991). Encyclopedic dictionary of exploration geophysics. Soc. of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Okla.
22.
Stoll, R. D., and Houtz, R. E.(1983). “Attenuation measurements with sonobuoys.”J. Acoustical Soc. of Am., 73, 163–172.
23.
Stoll, R. D. (1985). “Computer-aided studies of complex soil moduli.”Measurement and use of shear wave velocity for evaluating dynamic soil properties, R. D. Woods, ed., 18–33.
24.
Wu, S., Gray, D. H., and Richart, F. E.(1984). “Capillary effects on dynamic modules of sands and silts.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 110(9), 1188–1203.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1998
Published in print: Aug 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.