Experimental Behavior of Steel Fixed Bearings and Implications for Seismic Bridge Response
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 8
Abstract
Steel fixed bearings are commonplace structural elements for transmitting loads from superstructures to substructures, and they have typically occupied a role of elastic force transfer elements within the overall scheme of an earthquake resisting system (ERS). Recent revisions to design and guide specifications have acknowledged the possibility of bearings acting as fuses, but there is little research available to characterize bearing behavior for such design roles or the associated bridge response to be expected when bearings have fused. One design approach, adopted by the Illinois DOT (IDOT), applies capacity design principles and permits the bearings and superstructure to slide on the substructure. The intent of this design approach is to capture some of the beneficial aspects of conventional isolated systems, such as period elongation, reduction of force demands, and protection of substructures from large inelastic displacement demands, without incurring the additional design provisions and fabrication costs to satisfy the requirements for seismic isolation systems. To achieve this quasi-isolated bridge response, steel fixed bearings are used as fusing elements, where the steel pintles or anchor rods rupture, and the fixed bearing plates become free to slide on the supporting pier cap. A properly proportioned bearing will fuse prior to superstructure/substructure elements experiencing inelastic demands. The University of Illinois has been collaborating with IDOT to investigate the behavior of quasi-isolated bridge systems and to calibrate and refine IDOT’s ERS design and construction methodology. The research is composed of experimental testing to characterize fundamental bearing behavior, coupled with nonlinear global bridge modeling to evaluate limit state progression and estimate maximum displacement demands of the superstructure relative to the substructure. The cyclic response of full-scale steel low-profile fixed bearings demonstrates predictable sliding behavior, but based on current design procedures, these bearings are often overdesigned for use as fuses in quasi-isolated bridges. Consequently, a bridge, which in other respects may exhibit satisfactory quasi-isolated response, might also incur significant damage to the substructure unit where fixed bearings are provided. A parametric study of global bridge response demonstrates that the anchorage of fixed bearings to substructures could be reduced to limit the damage to the supporting substructure unit while incurring only a nominal increase in superstructure displacement demands.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This article is based on the results of ICT R27-70: “Calibration and Refinement of Illinois’ Earthquake Resisting System Bridge Design Methodology.” ICT R27-70 was conducted in cooperation with the Illinois Center for Transportation (ICT); IDOT, Division of Highways; and the U.S. DOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The contents of this article reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of ICT, IDOT, or FHWA. The authors thank the members of the project Technical Review Panel, chaired by D. H. Tobias of IDOT, for valuable assistance with this research.
References
AASHTO. (2004). “Steel bridge bearing design and detailing guidelines.” SBB-1, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010a). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2010b). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2011). Guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard specification for anchor bolts, steel, 36, 55, and 105-ksi yield strength.” F1554-07a, West Conshohocken, PA.
Fernandez, J. A., and Rix, G. J. (2006). “Soil attenuation relationships and seismic hazard analyses in the Upper Mississippi Embayment.” Proc., 8th National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, Paper No. 521.
Filipov, E. T. (2012). “Nonlinear seismic analysis of quasi-isolation systems for earthquake protection of bridges.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Filipov, E. T., et al. (2012). “Sensitivity of quasi-isolated bridge seismic response to variations in bearing and backwall elements.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering (IAEE), Tokyo, Paper No. 2978.
Filipov, E. T., et al. (2013a). “Seismic performance of highway bridges with fusing bearing components for quasi-isolation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 42(9), 1375–1394.
Filipov, E. T., Fahnestock, L. A., Steelman, J. S., LaFave, J. M., Hajjar, J. F., and Foutch, D. A. (2013b). “Evaluation of quasi-isolated seismic bridge behavior using nonlinear bearing models.” Eng. Struct., 49, 168–181.
Illinois DOT (IDOT). (2007). Standard specification for road and bridge construction, IDOT, Springfield, IL.
Illinois DOT (IDOT). (2009). Bridge manual, IDOT, Springfield, IL.
LaFave, J., et al. (2013a), “Experimental investigation of the seismic response of bridge bearings.” Research Rep. No. FHWA-ICT-13-002, Illinois Center for Transportation, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL.
LaFave, J., et al. (2013b). “Seismic performance of quasi-isolated highway bridges in Illinois.” Research Rep. No. FHWA-ICT-13-015, Illinois Center for Transportation, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Mander, J. B., Kim, D.-K., Chen, S. S., and Premus, G. J. (1996). “Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading.” National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Rep. No. NCEER-96-0014, Dept. of Civil Engineering, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY.
McKenna, F., Mazzoni, S., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees), Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Steelman, J. S., Fahnestock, L. A., Filipov, E. T., LaFave, J. M., Hajjar, J. F., and Foutch, D. A. (2013). “Shear and friction response of non-seismic laminated elastomeric bridge bearings subject to seismic demands.” J. Bridge Eng., 612–623.
Tobias, D. H., Anderson, R. E., Hodel, C. E., Kramer, W. M., Wahab, R. M., and Chaput, R. J. (2008). “Overview of earthquake resisting system design and retrofit strategy for bridges in Illinois.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 147–158.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 5, 2012
Accepted: Jul 25, 2013
Published online: Jul 27, 2013
Published ahead of production: Jul 29, 2013
Discussion open until: Jun 15, 2014
Published in print: Aug 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.