Skip to main content
Technical Papers
Dec 15, 2014

Setting Baseline Rates for On-Site Work Categories in the Construction Industry

Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 141, Issue 5

Abstract

Labor performance drives construction project performance. Labor performance can be improved by increasing the direct-work rate, which is the time spent by workers on installing materials and equipment. However, setting baseline rates for direct-work rate and determining expectation levels during the construction phase requires further investigation. The focus of the research reported in this paper is to establish a methodology for setting a desirable and realistic baseline rate based on activity analysis, primarily for industrial projects. First, an adaptive neurofuzzy inference system (ANFIS)-based method was developed as a means of estimating baseline rates based on existing knowledge. The method was trained using 272 data points. Its flexibility and functionality validate its usefulness; however, three additional methods of defining baseline rates were also developed based on simpler concepts and demonstrated with data points available from 14 projects, and the experience associated with these projects. As a result, comprehensive methods and a valuable initial dataset for industrial construction projects to better establish baseline rates for direct work and supporting activities were contributed. This should help project managers to estimate appropriate baselines and set realistic goals for direct-work rate which ultimately may lead to improvement of labor performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abdel-Wahab, M., and Vogl, B. (2011). “Trends of productivity growth in the construction industry across Europe, US and Japan.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(6), 635–644.
Allmon, E., Haas, C., Borcherding, J., and Goodrum, P. (2000). “US construction labor productivity trends, 1970-1998.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 97–104.
Baldwin, J., and Gu, W. (2009). Productivity performance in Canada, 1961 to 2008: An update on long-term trends, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
Bekar, E., Cakmakci, M., and Kahraman, C. (2013). An ANFIS model for forecasting risk by overall equipment effectiveness parameter in total productive maintenance, Taylor and Francis, London, 229–234 .
BRT (Business Roundtable). (1982). “Work sampling & foreman delay surveys (tools for improving productivity at construction sites).”.
Chiu, S. (1994). “Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation.” J. Intell Fuzzy Syst., 2(3), 267–278.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (2010). “Guide to activity analysis.”, Austin, TX.
CII (Construction Industry Institute). (2013). “The construction productivity handbook.”, Austin, TX.
Cus, F., Zuperl, U., Milfelner, M., and Mursec, B. (2006). “An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for modeling of end-milling.”, Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Goodrum, P. M., Haas, C. T., and Glover, R. W. (2002). “The divergence in aggregate and activity estimates of US construction productivity.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 20(5), 415–423.
Gouett, C., Haas, C., Goodrum, P., and Caldas, C. (2011). “Activity analysis for direct-work rate improvement in construction.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage., 1117–1121.
Gouett, M. C. (2010). Activity analysis for continuous productivity improvement in construction, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Groover, M. P. (2007). Work systems and the methods, measurement, and management of work, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Harrison, P. (2007). “Can measurement error explain the weakness of productivity growth in the Canadian construction industry?”, Center for the Study of Living Standards, Ottawa.
Hendrickson, C. (2000). “Project management for construction.” 〈http://ftp.ce.cmu.edu/〉 (Nov. 2, 2013).
Hewage, K. N., and Ruwanpura, J. Y. (2006). “Carpentry workers issues and efficiencies related to construction productivity in commercial construction projects in Alberta.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 33(8), 1075–1089.
Horman, M., and Kenley, R. (2005). “Quantifying levels of wasted time in construction with meta-analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 52–61.
Jang, J. (1992). “Self-learning fuzzy controllers based on temporal backpropagation.” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 3(5), 714–723.
Jang, J. (1993). “ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber., 23(3), 665–685.
Jenkins, J., and Orth, D. (2003). “Productivity improvement through work sampling.” AACE Int. Transactions of the Annual Meeting.
Jin, X.-H. (2011). “Model for efficient risk allocation in privately financed public infrastructure projects using neuro-fuzzy techniques.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1003–1014.
Josephson, P.-E., and Björkman, L. (2013). “Why do work sampling studies in construction? The case of plumbing work in Scandinavia.” Eng. Constr. Arch. Manage., 20(6), 589–603.
K. E. O’Brien and Associates. (2008). Improvement of onsite productivity, Toronto.
Kisi, O., Shiri, J., and Nikoofar, B. (2012). “Forecasting daily lake levels using artificial intelligence approaches.” Comput. Geosci., 41, 160–180.
Koehn, E., and Brown, G. (1985). “Climate effects on construction.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 129–137.
Lee, H., Yu, J., Jeong, Y., and Kim, S. (2012). “Genetic based feed-forward neural network training for chaff cluster detection.” Fuzzy Theory and its Applications (iFUZZY), 2012 Int. Conf., IEEE, 215–219.
Liou, F., and Borcherding, J. (1986). “Work sampling can predict unit rate productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 90–103.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Waterloo, ON, Canada, Univ. of Waterloo.
Mohammadian, R., and Waugh, L. (1997). Productivity adjustment in construction price indexes, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
Nasir, H., Ahmed, H., Haas, C., and Goodrum, P. (2014). “An analysis of construction productivity differences between Canada and the United States.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ., 32(6), 595–607.
NECA (National Electrical Contractors Association). (1974). “The effect of temperature on productivity.”, Washington, DC.
Oglesby, C. H. (1989). Productivity improvement in construction, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Park, H., Thomas, S. R., and Tucker, R. L. (2005). “Benchmarking of construction productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 772–778.
Rivas, R. A., Borcherding, J. D., González, V., and Alarcón, L. F. (2011). “Analysis of factors influencing productivity using craftsmen questionnaires: Case study in a Chilean construction company.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 312–320.
Shahhosseini, V., and Sebt, M. (2011). “Competency-based selection and assignment of human resources to construction projects.” Scientia Iranica, 18(2), 163–180.
Shahtaheri, M. (2012). “Setting target rates for activity analysis categories.” M.A.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Teicholz, P. (2001). “US construction labor productivity trends, 1970–1998. Discussion by Paul Teicholz.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 427–429.
Thomas, H. R., Maloney, W. F., Horner, R. M. W., Smith, G. R., Handa, V. K., and Sanders, S. R. (1990). “Modeling construction labor productivity.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 705–726.
Thomas, H. R., and Mathews, C. (1986). “An analysis of the methods for measuring construction productivity.”, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Uros, Z., Franc, C., and Edi, K. (2009). “Adaptive network based inference system for estimation of flank wear in end-milling.” J. Mater. Process Technol., 209(3), 1504–1511.
Wei, L.-Y., Cheng, C.-H., and Wu, H.-H. (2014). “A hybrid ANFIS based on n-period moving average model to forecast TAIEX stock.” Appl. Soft Comput., 19, 86–92.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 141Issue 5May 2015

History

Received: Jun 26, 2014
Accepted: Nov 10, 2014
Published online: Dec 15, 2014
Published in print: May 1, 2015
Discussion open until: May 15, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Maryam Shahtaheri [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Hassan Nasir, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.Eng.
Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]
Carl T. Haas, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.Eng.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share