Environmental Product Declarations: Use in the Architectural and Engineering Design Process to Support Sustainable Construction
Publication: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144, Issue 5
Abstract
High-performing and sustainable building certification bodies continue to update their requirements, leading to modifications in the scope of certifications and increasing the number of viable sources of environmental information for building materials. In conjunction, the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is seeing increasing demand for such environmental product information. The authors conducted a survey of 119 U.S.-based AEC practitioners experienced in certified sustainable building projects to understand the sources for environmental information and how this information is used in the building design process. The analysis of survey responses forms the basis of this paper, which provides three contributions to the body of knowledge: (1) identifying the AEC professionals’ varying experiences with sustainable building certifications and environmental performance information for building materials [the results show a correlation between use of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating systems and the exposure of members of the AEC industry to new environmental information sources]; (2) identifying the differing levels of knowledge and use of the environmental product declaration (EPD), a new environmental information source (most of the survey respondents who had used any environmental information sources were familiar with EPDs); and (3) providing insight into EPD use and guidance from early adopters for effective future use. These findings can help the AEC industry efficiently implement EPDs into its design and construction processes and better understand the environmental impacts of building materials used in construction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. Information about the Journal’s data-sharing policy can be found here: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001263.
Acknowledgments
This material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1311230. The authors would also like to acknowledge the time and assistance of numerous industry contacts. The content of this paper reflects the views of the authors, who are responsible for the accuracy of data presented herein, and does not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF or survey respondents.
References
Anand, C. K., and Amor, B. (2017). “Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 67, 408–416.
Bakhoum, E. S., and Brown, D. C. (2012). “Developed sustainable scoring system for structural materials evaluation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 110–119.
Baumann, H., and Tillman, A.-M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA: An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application, Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden.
Buckley, B., and Logan, K. (2016). World green building trends 2016: Developing markets accelerate global green growth, Dodge Data and Analytics, Bedford, MA.
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., and Castell, A. (2014). “Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 29, 394–416.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2012). “Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products.” EN 15804, Brussels, Belgium.
Chick, A., and Micklethwaite, P. (2004). “Specifying recycled: Understanding UK architects’ and designers’ practices and experience.” Des. Stud., 25(3), 251–273.
Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. (2017a). “Cradle to cradle certified products registry.” ⟨http://www.c2ccertified.org/products/registry⟩ (Aug. 16, 2017).
Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. (2017b). “Get cradle to cradle certified.” ⟨http://www.c2ccertified.org/get-certified/product-certification⟩ (Aug. 16, 2017).
El Asmar, M., Hanna, A. S., and Loh, W.-Y. (2013). “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013012.
EPD International AB. (2017). “EPD, the green yardstick.” ⟨http://www.environdec.com/⟩ (Aug. 16, 2017).
Gelowitz, M. D. C., and McArthur, J. J. (2016). “Investigating the effect of environmental product declaration adoption in LEED® on the construction industry: A case study.” Procedia Eng., 145, 58–65.
GBI (Green Building Initiative). (2016). “Green globes for new construction, technical reference manual, version 1.45, materials and resources.” Portland, OR, 138–206.
GBI (Green Building Initiative). (2017). “Certified building directory.” ⟨https://www.thegbi.org/project-portfolio/certified-building-directory/⟩ (Aug. 16, 2017).
Hofstetter, P., and Mettier, T. M. (2003). “What users want and may need: Insights from a survey of users of a life-cycle tool.” J. Industrial Ecol., 7(2), 79–101.
Holloway, S., and Parrish, K. (2015). “The contractor’s role in the sustainable construction industry.” Proc. Instit. Civ. Eng.-Eng. Sustain., 168(2), 53–60.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2006a). “Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations—Principles and procedures.” ISO 14025:2006, Geneva.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2006b). “Environment management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework.” ISO 14040:2006, Geneva.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). (2006c). “Environment management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.” ISO 14044:2006, Geneva.
Javernick-Will, A. (2012). “Motivating knowledge sharing in engineering and construction organizations: Power of social motivations.” J. Manage. Eng., 193–202.
Kam-Biron, M., and Podesto, L. (2011). “The growing role of wood in building sustainability.” AEI 2011: Building Integration Solutions, ASCE, Reston, VA, 318–326.
Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Lamé, G., Leroy, Y., and Yannou, B. (2017). “Ecodesign tools in the construction sector: Analyzing usage inadequacies with designers’ needs.” J. Clean. Prod., 148, 60–72.
Minchin, R. E., Li, X., Issa, R. R., and Vargas, G. G. (2013). “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013007.
NVivo version 11.4.1 [Computer software]. QSR International, Burlington, MA.
Olinzock, M. A., et al. (2015). “Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: Summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 20(3), 318–331.
Qualtrics version 02-2017–02-2018 [Computer software]. Qualtrics, Provo, UT.
Rodriguez-Nikl, T., Kelley, J., Xiao, Q., Hammer, K., and Tilt, B. (2015). “Structural engineers and sustainability: An opinion survey.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Edu. Pract., 04014011.
Said, H., and Berger, L. (2014). “Future trends of sustainability design and analysis in construction industry and academia.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 77–88.
Saunders, C. L., Landis, A. E., Mecca, L. P., Jones, A. K., Schaefer, L. A., and Bilec, M. M. (2013). “Analyzing the practice of life cycle assessment: Focus on the building sector.” J. Ind. Ecol., 17(5), 777–788.
Schaufelberger, J., and Cloud, J. (2009). “LEED certification: A constructor’s perspective.” Construction Research Congress 2009: Building a Sustainable Future, ASCE, Reston, VA, 598–607.
Sheskin, D. J. (2007). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
SPSS version 24 [Computer software]. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). (2009). “LEED reference guide for green building design and construction.” Washington, DC.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). (2013). “LEED reference guide for building design and construction.” Washington, DC.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). (2017). “Infographic: Top 10 state for LEED in 2016.” ⟨https://www.usgbc.org/articles/infographic-top-10-states-for-leed-in-2016⟩ (Aug. 16, 2017).
Zhong, Y., Ling, F. Y. Y., and Wu, P. (2017). “Using multiple attribute value techinique for the selection of structural frame material to acheive sustainability and constructability.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04016098.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume 144 • Issue 5 • May 2018
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 23, 2017
Accepted: Nov 15, 2017
Published online: Mar 13, 2018
Published in print: May 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Aug 13, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.