Optimizing the Desilting Efficiency of Submerged Vane Fields at Lateral Diversions
Publication: Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Volume 149, Issue 1
Abstract
The design criteria of submerged vane fields used to control the transfer of sediments into lateral channel diversions have been mostly based on suggestions of some fundamental studies on vane fields aiming to protect riverbanks against erosion. Indeed, although there are studies that investigate the effect of some characteristic parameters of submerged vanes on the desilting of lateral diversions (prevention or reduction of lateral sediment ingestion), they do not adequately cover all pertinent parameters and their significant ranges. In view of the gap of knowledge resulting from this incomplete parametric coverage, an investigation comprising 26 experiments was conducted. It investigated the effects of geometrical vane parameters and specific water discharge ratios on the desilting efficiency of submerged vane fields and on the bed morphology around a 90° lateral water diversion. The vanes displayed skew angles between 10° and 50°, and their heights were 0.2 to 0.4 times the approach flow depth. The distance from the channel bank to the inner vane row and the streamwise distance between vane arrays were, respectively, 0.7 to 1.5 and 2.0 to 3.0 times the approach flow depth. The specific water discharge ratio, , varied between 0.1 and 0.3, and the number of vane rows was 6 and 3. The skew angle and the specific water discharge ratio were the most effective parameters on desilting, whereas the others had a small effect within the experimental limits of this study. The optimal desilting efficiency, , was achieved when the skew angle was equal to 45° and was kept in the range of 0.1 to 0.2.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request:
•
Bed bathymetries and water surface levels of each experiment at every 6 h.
•
Collected sediment weights at every 3 h.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank to TÜBİTAK for the financial support (Application No. 1059B192000756).
References
Ackers, P., and W. R. White. 1973. “Sediment transport: New approach and analysis.” J. Hydraul. Div. 99 (11): 2041–2060. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003791.
Baltazar, J., E. Alves, G. Bombar, and A. H. Cardoso. 2021. “Effect of a submerged vane field on the flow pattern of a movable bed channel with a 90° lateral diversion.” Water 13 (6): 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060828.
Barkdoll, B. D., R. Ettema, and A. J. Odgaard. 1999. “Sediment control at lateral diversions: Limits and enhancements to vane use.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (8): 862–870. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:8(862).
Firozjaei, M. R., S. S. Neyshabouri, S. A. Sola, and S. H. Mohajeri. 2019. “Numerical simulation on the performance improvement of a lateral intake using submerged vanes.” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 43 (Jul): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0126-z.
Galan, A., G. Simarro, C. Fael, and A. H. Cardoso. 2018. “Clear-water scour at submerged pile groups.” Int. J. River Basin Manage. 17 (1): 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2018.1446964.
Guillén-Ludeña, S., M. J. Franca, A. H. Cardoso, and A. J. Schleiss. 2015. “Evolution of the hydromorphodynamics of mountain river confluences for varying discharge ratios and junction angles.” Geomorphology 255 (Dec): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.12.006.
Herrero, A., A. Bateman, and V. Medina. 2015. “Water flow and sediment transport in a 90° channel diversion: An experimental study.” J. Hydraul. Res. 53 (2): 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2014.989457.
Hsu, C. C., C. J. Tang, W. J. Lee, and M. Y. Shieh. 2002. “Subcritical 90° equal-width open-channel dividing flow.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 128 (7): 716–720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:7(716).
Kalathil, S. T., A. Wuppukondur, R. K. Balakrishnan, and V. Chandra. 2018. “Control of sediment inflow into a trapezoidal intake canal using submerged vanes.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 144 (6): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000474.
Marelius, F., and S. K. Sinha. 1998. “Experimental investigation of flow past submerged vanes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (5): 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:5(542).
Melville, B. W., and S. E. Coleman. 2000. Bridge scour. Washington, DC: Water Resources Publication.
Michell, F., R. Ettema, and M. Muste. 2006. “Case study: Sediment control at water intake for large thermal-power station on a small river.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 132 (5): 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:5(440).
Moghadam, M. K., and A. R. Keshavarzi. 2009. “An optimised water intake with the presence of submerged vanes in irrigation canals.” Irrig. Drain. 59 (4): 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.504.
Nakato, T., J. F. Kennedy, and D. Bauerly. 1990. “Pump-station intake-shoaling control with submerged vanes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 116 (1): 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1990)116:1(119).
Nakato, T., and F. L. Ogden. 1998. “Sediment control at water intakes along sand-bed rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 124 (6): 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:6(589).
Neary, V. S., and A. J. Odgaard. 1993. “Three-dimensional flow structure at open-channel diversions.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 119 (11): 1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:11(1223).
Odgaard, A. J. 2009. River training and sediment management with submerged vanes. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Odgaard, A. J., and J. F. Kennedy. 1983. “River-bend bank protection by submerged vanes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 109 (8): 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1983)109:8(1161).
Odgaard, A. J., and C. E. Mosconi. 1987. “Streambank protection by submerged vanes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 113 (4): 520–536. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1987)113:4(520).
Odgaard, A. J., and A. Spoljaric. 1986. “Sediment control by submerged vanes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 112 (12): 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:12(1164).
Odgaard, A. J., and A. Spoljaric. 1989. “Sediment control by submerged vanes. Design basis.” In Vol. 12 of River Meandering, edited by S. Ikeda and G. Parker, 127–151. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Odgaard, A. J., and Y. Wang. 1991a. “Sediment management with submerged vanes. I: Theory.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 117 (3): 267. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:3(267).
Odgaard, A. J., and Y. Wang. 1991b. “Sediment management with submerged vanes. II: Applications.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 117 (3): 284–302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:3(284).
Ouyang, H., and C. Lu. 2016. “Optimizing the spacing of submerged vanes across rivers for stream bank protection at channel bends.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (12): 04016062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001210.
Rao, N. L., K. Sridharan, and M. Y. A. Baig. 1968. “Experimental study of the division of flow in an open channel.” In Proc., Conf. Hydraulic and Fluid Mechanics, 139–142. Washington, DC: Institution of Engineers.
Raudkivi, A. J. 1986. “Functional trends of scour at bridge piers.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 112 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1986)112:1(1).
Simons, D. B., and E. V. Richardson. 1966. Resistance to flow in alluvial channels. Washington, DC: USGS.
Tan, S. K., G. Yu, S. Y. Lim, and M. C. Ong. 2005. “Flow structure and sediment motion around submerged vanes in open channel.” J. Waterw. Port Coastal Ocean Eng. 131 (3): 132–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2005)131:3(132).
van Rijn, L. C. 1984. “Sediment transport, Part I: Bed load transport.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 110 (10): 1431–1456. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:10(1431).
Wang, Y., A. J. Odgaard, B. W. Melville, and S. C. Jain. 1996. “Sediment control at water intakes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 122 (6): 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1996)122:6(353).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2022
Accepted: Aug 4, 2022
Published online: Oct 31, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Anirban Mandal, Hariom Gautam, Zulfequar Ahmad, Sediment control and flow redistribution with submerged vanes: a review, Water Practice & Technology, 10.2166/wpt.2024.131, 19, 5, (2197-2212), (2024).
- Firat Gumgum, António Heleno Cardoso, Effect of diversion angle and vanes' skew angle on the hydro-morpho-dynamics of mobile-bed open-channel bifurcations controlled by submerged vane-fields, Physics of Fluids, 10.1063/5.0211623, 36, 7, (2024).
- Chien-Yung Tseng, Jiyong Lee, Michele Guala, Mirko Musa, Experimental Tests of Lateral Bedload Transport Induced by a Yawed Submerged Vane Array in Open-Channel Flows, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 10.1061/JHEND8.HYENG-14076, 150, 6, (2024).
- Javad Ahadiyan, Saman Abbasi Chenari, Hossein Azizi Nadian, Christos Katopodis, Mohammad Valipour, Seyed Mohsen Sajjadi, Mona Omidvarinia, Sustainable systems engineering by CFD modeling of lateral intake flow with flexible gate operations to improve efficient water supply, International Journal of Sediment Research, 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2024.05.003, 39, 4, (629-642), (2024).
- Bestami Taşar, Fatih Üneş, Ercan Gemici, Martina Zelenakova, Experimental and Numerical Study on Flow Control Using 3-Array Submerged Vane in Laboratory Channel Bend, Water, 10.3390/w15040659, 15, 4, (659), (2023).