Network-Level Bridge Deterioration Prediction Models That Consider the Effect of Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 1
Abstract
With the increasing number of aging bridges that need maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R), it is important to plan and prioritize M&R projects proactively. This process requires mathematical models capable of predicting bridge condition over multiyear planning horizons taking into account the long-term performance effects of M&R treatments. This paper describes the development, validation, and application of Markov chain–based bridge deterioration prediction models. Bridge condition is measured in terms of the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) deck rating, superstructure rating, substructure rating, and culvert rating. The models consider explanatory variables that affect bridge deterioration, including climate/environment, traffic loading, material type, and M&R type. Because data on M&R work history are often disconnected from bridge condition data, the study used a novel approach that allows for inferring past M&R type and timing based on changes in bridge condition ratings. The models were developed using condition data for 43,320 bridges across Texas extending from 2001 to 2017. The developed prediction models can be used as a tool to support bridge asset management planning in Texas. The modeling approach, however, can be used by transportation agencies across the world to develop bridge deterioration prediction models using their local empirical data.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Texas Data Repository as follows:
1.
The Texas NBI data: https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/ZHXLDE
2.
The Texas bridge M&R work history data: https://doi.org/10.18738/T8/AYQGPX
Other researchers can access the data through these repositories.
References
Abaza, K. A. 2016. “Simplified staged-homogeneous Markov model for flexible pavement performance prediction.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 17 (2): 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1083464.
Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Bu, G. P., J. H. Lee, H. Guan, Y. C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2014. “Implementation of Elman neural networks for enhancing reliability of integrated bridge deterioration model.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 15 (1): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.7158/S12-046.2014.15.1.
Busa, G., M. Cassella, W. Gazda, and R. Horn. 1985. A national bridge deterioration model. Cambridge, MA: Transportation Systems Center Kendall Square.
Butt, A., M. Y. Shahin, K. J. Feighan, and S. H. Carpenter. 1987. “Pavement performance prediction model using the Markov process.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1123 (1): 12–19.
Cavalline, T. L., M. J. Whelan, B. Q. Tempest, R. Goyal, and J. D. Ramsey. 2015. Determination of bridge deterioration models and bridge user costs for the NCDOT bridge management system. Charlotte, NC: North Carolina DOT.
Devaraj, D. 2009. Application of non-homogeneous Markov chains in bridge management systems. Ann Arbor, MI: Wayne State Univ.
Dunker, K. F., and B. G. Rabbat. 1990. “Highway bridge type and performance patterns.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 4 (3): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1990)4:3(161).
Fitzpatrick, M. W., D. A. Law, and W. C. Dixon. 1980. The deterioration of New York State highway structures, engineering research and development bureau. New York: New York State DOT.
Frangopol, D. M. 2011. “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimisation of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (6): 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732471003594427.
Golabi, K., and R. Shepard. 1997. “Pontis: A system for maintenance optimization and improvement of US bridge networks.” INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 27 (1): 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.27.1.71.
Goyal, R. 2015. Development of a survival based framework for bridge deterioration modeling with large-scale application to the North Carolina bridge management system. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Guide, F. B. P. 2018. Maintaining a resilient infrastructure to preserve mobility. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Hatami, A., and G. Morcous. 2012. “Deterioration models for life-cycle cost analysis of bridge decks in Nebraska.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2313 (1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/2313-01.
Hawk, H., and E. P. Small. 1998. “The BRIDGIT bridge management system.” Struct. Eng. Int. 8 (4): 309–314. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488712.
Hearn, G. 2020. Proposed AASHTO guides for bridge preservation actions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Huang, Y.-H. 2010. “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (6): 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000124.
Hyman, W. A., and D. J. Hughes. 1983. “Computer model for life-cycle cost analysis of statewide bridge repair and replacement needs.” Transp. Res. Rec. 899 (1): 52–61.
Ilbeigi, M., and M. E. Meimand. 2020. “Statistical forecasting of bridge deterioration conditions.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 34 (1): 04019104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001347.
Jiang, Y., M. Saito, and K. C. Sinha. 1988. “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1180: 25–32.
Jiang, Y., and K. C. Sinha. 1989. “Bridge service life prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1223 (1): 24–30.
Li, L., F. Li, Z. Chen, and L. Sun. 2016. “Use of Markov chain model based on actual repair status to predict bridge deterioration in Shanghai, China.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2550 (1): 106–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2550-14.
Lu, P., H. Wang, and D. Tolliver. 2019. “Prediction of bridge component ratings using ordinal logistic regression model.” Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (1): 9797584. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9797584.
Markow, M. J., and W. A. Hyman. 2009. Bridge management systems for transportation agency decision making. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Mašović, S., and R. Hajdin. 2014. “Modelling of bridge elements deterioration for Serbian bridge inventory.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (8): 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.774426.
Menendez, J. R., S. Z. Siabil, P. Narciso, and N. G. Gharaibeh. 2013. “Prioritizing infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation activities under various budgetary scenarios: Evaluation of worst-first and benefit–cost analysis approaches.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2361 (1): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.3141/2361-07.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Morcous, G. 2006. “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20 (2): 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2006)20:2(146).
Morcous, G., H. Rivard, and A. M. Hanna. 2002. “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (3): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:3(86).
Puz, G., and J. Radic. 2011. “Life-cycle performance model based on homogeneous Markov processes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (4): 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802532943.
Radomski, W. 2002. Bridge rehabilitation. Washington, DC: World Scientific.
Ranjith, S., S. Setunge, R. Gravina, and S. Venkatesan. 2013. “Deterioration prediction of timber bridge elements using the Markov chain.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 27 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000311.
Roelfstra, G., R. Hajdin, B. Adey, and E. Brühwiler. 2004. “Condition evolution in bridge management systems and corrosion-induced deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (3): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:3(268).
Sánchez-Silva, M., D. M. Frangopol, J. Padgett, and M. Soliman. 2016. “Maintenance and operation of infrastructure systems: Review.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (9): F4016004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001543.
Thompson, P. D., and M. B. Johnson. 2005. “Markovian bridge deterioration: Developing models from historical data.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1 (1): 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470412331289332.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2020. Bridge facts, Texas. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Veshosky, D., C. R. Beidleman, G. W. Buetow, and M. Demir. 1994. “Comparative analysis of bridge superstructure deterioration.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (7): 2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:7(2123).
Wallis, S. 2013. “Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: Mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods.” J. Quant. Ling. 20 (3): 178–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2013.799918.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.
West, H. H., R. M. McClure, E. J. Gannon, H. L. Riad, and B. B. Siverling. 1989. A nonlinear deterioration model for the estimation of bridge design life. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania Transportation Institute.
Wu, D., C. Yuan, W. Kumfer, and H. Liu. 2017. “A life-cycle optimization model using semi-Markov process for highway bridge maintenance.” Appl. Math. Modell. 43 (Mar): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.10.038.
Zambon, I., A. Vidovic, A. Strauss, J. Matos, and J. Amado. 2017. “Comparison of stochastic prediction models based on visual inspections of bridge decks.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 23 (5): 553–561. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2017.1323795.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 7, 2021
Accepted: Sep 24, 2021
Published online: Nov 22, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 22, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Khaled A. Abaza, Stochastic-based pavement rehabilitation model at the network level with prediction uncertainty considerations, Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10.1080/14680629.2022.2164330, (1-19), (2023).
- Jixin Duan, Weili He, Shizhan Xu, Zhaoyuan Zhong, Liang Huang, Smartphone-Based and Data-Driven Superstructure State Prediction Method for Highway Bridges in Service, Sensors, 10.3390/s22155620, 22, 15, (5620), (2022).
- Ao Du, Jiannan Cai, undefined, Tran-SET 2022, 10.1061/9780784484609.029, (270-279), (2022).