Is Arbitration the Right Way to Settle Conflicts in PPP Arrangements?
Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 1
Abstract
Conflicts are common in the construction industry. The characteristics of public-private partnership (PPP) arrangements make them prone to conflicts, some of which are acute and jeopardize the success of the project. Because litigation is time-consuming and costly, an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) might be a viable substitute for court action. Among the different types of ADRs, arbitration assumes prominence not only because of its extensive use, particularly as the last attempt before litigation, but also because the results of arbitration are attributable to rules, applied according to a contract and the discretion of arbitrators, for which appeal is seldom allowed. Therefore, although the idea of arbitration suggests a beneficial resolution, the public interest, proportionality, and fairness are not always ensured. Through an empirical case study, the sound features of arbitration are presented as are cautions to consider when adopting the ADR strategy of arbitration. Undue use of arbitration can become perverse. In particular, the public partner should avoid arbitration by endowing the contract with good governance practices and by compulsorily trying other types of ADR first. Moreover, the contract should stipulate that continuous information and knowledge about the project are provided to the public sector. Finally, the right to appeal should always be allowed even if the decision is allowed to stand to avoid stopping a project.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks the FCT (SFRH/BSAB/114634/2016) (Portuguese national funding agency for science, research and technology) for the possibility of being under sabbatical leave in the University of Cornell in the USA for the period during which this research took place.
References
Cruz, C., and Marques, R. (2012). “Using probabilistic methods to estimate the public sector comparator.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 27(10), 782–800.
Cruz, C., and Marques, R. (2013a). “Endogenous determinants for renegotiating concessions: evidence from local infrastructure.” Local Gov. Stud., 39(3), 352–374.
Cruz, C., and Marques, R. (2013b). “Exogenous determinants for renegotiation of public infrastructure concession.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 1058–1090.
ERSAR. (2010). Relatório anual dos serviços de águas e resíduos em Portugal, Entidade Reguladora dos Serviços de Águas e Resíduos (ERSAR), Lisbon, Portugal.
Fabyanske, M., and Halverson, S. (1980). “Arbitration: Is it an acceptable method of resolving construction contract disputes?” Forum, 16, 281.
Green, M. (2009). No strict evidence rules in labor and employment arbitration, School of Law, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Guasch, J. L., Benitez, D., Portabales, I., and Flor, L. (2014). “The renegotiation of PPP contracts: An overview of its recent evolution in Latin America.” International Transport Forum Discussion Paper 18, Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
Harisankar, K. S., and Sreeparvathy, G. (2013). “Rethinking dispute resolution in public–private partnerships for infrastructure development in India.” J. Infrastruct. Dev., 5(1), 21–32.
Harmon, K. (2004). “Cost-effective strategies for arbitration.” Leadership Manage. Eng., 148–153.
Hinchey, J. (2012). “Chapter 12: Dispute resolution in managing gigaprojects.” Managing gigaprojects: Advice from those who've been there, done that, P. D. Galloway, K. Nielsen, and J. L. Dignum, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Kangari, R. (1995). “Construction documentation in arbitration.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 201–208.
Marques, R., and Berg, S. (2011). “Risks, contracts and private sector participation in infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 925–933.
Partnerships Victoria. (2003). “Contract management guide. Partnerships Victoria.” Melbourne, Australia.
Patterson, C. (1997). “Editorial: Alternative dispute resolution. Resolving dispute with less wear and tear.” J. Manage. Eng., 12–14.
PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2008). “International arbitration: Corporate attitudes and practices 2008.” PricewaterHouseCoopers, London.
Silberman, A. (1997). “Mediation is not arbitration.” J. Manage. Eng., 19–20.
Soderstrum, B. (2005). “Litigation v. arbitration: Pros and cons.” Brown, Winick, Graves, Gross, Baskerville, and Schoenebaum, Des Moines, IA.
Stephenson, D. (2001). Arbitration practice in construction contracts, 5th Ed., Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
Stipanowich, T. (2010). “Arbitration: The ‘new litigation.’” University of Illinois Law Rev., 1, 1–59.
Tanielian, A. (2013). “Arbitration still best road to binding dispute resolution.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr., 90–96.
Teo, E., and Aibinu, A. (2007). “Legal framework for alternative dispute resolution: Examination of the Singapore national legal system for arbitration.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 148–157.
Timmermans, W., and Behr, A. (2016). “Why an independent UN arbitration tribunal for the settlement of PPP disputes is necessary.” Economic Commission for Europe Committee on Innovation, Competitiveness and Public-Private Partnerships, Team of Specialists on Public-Private Partnerships, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva.
Torchia, M., and Calabrò, A. (2016). “Increasing the governance standards of public-private partnerships in healthcare. Evidence from Italy.” Public Org. Rev., in press.
Treacy, T. (1995). “Use of alternative dispute resolution in the construction industry.” J. Manage. Eng., 58–63.
Vining, A., Boardman, A., and Poschmann, F. (2005). “Public–private partnerships in the US and Canada: ‘There are no free lunches.’” J. Comp. Policy Anal. Res. Pract., 7(3), 199–220.
Vorster, M. (1993). Dispute prevention and resolution (source document), The Construction Industry Institute, Austin, TX.
Yates, J., and Duran, J. (2006). “Utilizing dispute review boards in relational contracting: A case study.” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 334–341.
Yescombe, E. (2007). Public-private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance, 1st Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, MA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 34 • Issue 1 • January 2018
Copyright
© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 27, 2017
Accepted: Jun 29, 2017
Published online: Oct 12, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.