Equitable Resilience in Infrastructure Systems: Empirical Assessment of Disparities in Hardship Experiences of Vulnerable Populations during Service Disruptions
Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 21, Issue 4
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine social inequality in exposure and hardship experienced by various groups due to infrastructure service disruptions in disasters. After more than two decades, the existing literature related to infrastructure resilience mainly focuses on system performance and considers the impacts of service disruptions to be equal for the public. The public, however, is not a monolithic entity, and different subpopulations have distinct needs and expectations of infrastructure systems. Thus, the same duration of service loss will not be experienced equally by the affected residents. Social subpopulations in a community have preexisting differences, or sociodemographic characteristics, which account for differential variations in disaster experience, and often socially vulnerable groups are disproportionally affected. Unfortunately, there is limited empirical information regarding inequity in the societal impacts of infrastructure service disruptions during disasters. This study addresses this knowledge gap by developing an equitable infrastructure resilience approach that integrates both the physical characteristics of the infrastructure systems and the sociodemographic characteristics that contribute to risk disparity experienced by individual households. The risk disparity was assessed by considering both the duration of the service disruptions (exposure) and people’s ability to withstand disruptions (zone of tolerance). The study investigated empirical data related to the transportation, power, communication, and water service disruptions caused by Hurricane Harvey in 2017 for Harris County residents. The results concluded that certain socially vulnerable groups reported significant disparity in the hardship people experienced due to infrastructure service disruptions caused by the disaster. The significant experienced hardship was rooted in the group’s having a lower zone of tolerance for service disruptions, experiencing a significantly higher duration of service outages, or a coupling effect when there was both greater exposure and lower zone of tolerance. The findings further revealed the following: (1) households with low socioeconomic status reported a coupling effect for communication and water disruptions and reported a lower zone of tolerance for transportation and power disruptions; (2) racial minority groups reported a coupling effect for transportation, communication, and water disruptions and a lower zone of tolerance for power disruption; and (3) households with younger residents reported a coupling effect for communication disruption, greater exposure to transportation and water disruptions, and lower zone of tolerance for power disruption. The findings uncovered existing inequalities in exposure and hardship experienced due to infrastructure service disruptions for various vulnerable subpopulations. Hence, the study establishes the fundamental knowledge and empirical information needed for an equitable resilience approach in infrastructure systems in order to better prioritize investments and therefore effectively reduce the risk disparity of vulnerable populations during service disruptions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are proprietary or confidential in nature and may only be provided with restrictions. The household survey data used in this research received Institutional Review Board (IRB) for the human subject. As a part of the IRB data protection requirement, only the research team have access to the data, and the data cannot be shared with others.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1846069 and National Academies’ Gulf Research Program Early-Career Research Fellowship. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this research are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the funding agencies.
References
Aptekar, L., and J. Boore. 1990. “The emotional effects of disaster on children: A review of literature.” Int. J. Mental Health 19 (2): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.1990.11449164.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 2016. Critical assessment of lifeline system performance: Understanding societal needs in disaster recovery. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Baker, E. J. 2011. “Household preparedness for the aftermath of Hurricanes in Florida.” Appl. Geogr. 31 (1): 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.002.
Berkeley, A. R., III, and M. Wallace. 2010. A framework for establishing critical infrastructure resilience goals: Final report and recommendations by the council. Washington, DC: National Infrastructure Advisory Council.
Blake, E. S., and D. A. Zelinsky. 2018. National Hurricane Center tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Harvey. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; National Weather Service.
Burton, C. G. 2010. “Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 11 (2): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2010)11:2(58).
CBS/AP (CBS News/Associated Press). 2017. “Hurricane Harvey: Texas power outages affect more than quarter million.” Accessed September 1, 2018. www.cbsnews.com/news/hurricane-harvey-texas-power-outages-affect-more-than-255000.
Chakraborty, J., T. W. Collins, M. C. Montgomery, and S. E. Grineski. 2014. “Social and spatial inequities in exposure to flood risk in Miami, Florida.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 15 (3): 04014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000140.
Chang, S. 2016. “Socioeconomic impacts of infrastructure disruptions.” In Oxford research encyclopedia of natural hazard science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chang, S. E., and N. Nojima. 2001. “Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: The 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 35 (6): 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(00)00003-3.
Clark, S. S., T. P. Seager, and M. V. Chester. 2018. “A capabilities approach to the prioritization of critical infrastructure.” Environ. Syst. Decis. 38: 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9691-8.
Davis, S. 2018. Hurricane Harvey: Impact of Harvey on Houston MUDs. Austin, TX: Meyers Research and Municipal Information Services.
Doorn, N., P. Gardoni, and C. Murphy. 2018. “A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: The role of social justice in defining resilience.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 4 (3): 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1428162.
Esmalian, A., S. Dong, N. Coleman, and A. Mostafavi. Forthcoming. “Determinants of risk disparity due to infrastructure service losses in disasters: A household service gap model.” Risk Anal.
Faber, J. W. 2015. “Superstorm Sandy and the demographics of flood risk in New York City.” Hum. Ecol. 43 (3): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-015-9757-x.
Flanagan, B. E., E. W. Gregory, E. J. Hallisey, J. L. Heitgerd, and B. Lewis. 2011. “A social vulnerability index for disaster management.” J. Homeland Secur. Emergency Manage. 8 (1): Article 3. https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1792.
Fothergill, A., J. A. DeRouen Darlington, and E. G. M. Maestas. 1999. “Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature.” Disasters 23 (2): 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00111.
Fothergill, A., and L. A. Peek. 2004. “Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings.” Nat. Hazards 32 (1): 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9.
Gomez, C., and J. W. Baker. 2019. “An optimization-based decision support framework for coupled pre- and post-earthquake infrastructure risk management.” Struct. Saf. 77 (Mar): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.10.002.
Highfield, W. E., W. G. Peacock, and S. Van Zandt. 2014. “Mitigation planning: Why hazard exposure, structural vulnerability, and social vulnerability matter.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 34 (3): 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X14531828.
Horney, J. 2008. “Factors associated with hurricane preparedness: Results of a pre-hurricane assessment.” J. Disaster Res. 3 (2): 143–149. https://doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2008.p0143.
Lindell, M. K., and S. N. Hwang. 2008. “Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment.” Risk Anal. 28 (2): 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x.
Lindell, M. K., and C. S. Prater. 2003. “Assessing community impacts of natural disasters.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 4 (4): 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(176).
Marsh, B., A. M. Parnell, and A. M. Joyner. 2010. “Institutionalization of racial inequality in local political geographies.” Urban Geogr. 31 (5): 691–709. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.5.691.
Masozera, M., M. Bailey, and C. Kerchner. 2007. “Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans.” Ecol. Econ. 63 (2–3): 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013.
McDaniels, T., S. Chang, K. Peterson, J. Mikawoz, and D. Reed. 2007. “Empirical framework for characterizing infrastructure failure interdependencies.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (3): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:3(175).
Mostafavi, A. 2018. “A system-of-systems framework for exploratory analysis of climate change impacts on civil infrastructure resilience.” Sustainable Resilient Infrastruct. 3 (4): 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1416845.
Mostafavi, A., N. E. Ganapati, H. Nazarnia, N. Pradhananga, and R. Khanal. 2018. “Adaptive capacity under chronic stressors: Assessment of water infrastructure resilience in 2015 Nepalese Earthquake using a system approach.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000263.
Murphy, C., and P. Gardoni. 2006. “The role of society in engineering risk analysis: A capabilities-based approach.” Risk Anal. 26 (4): 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00801.x.
National Research Council. 2012. Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Ott, L., and M. Longnecker. 2010. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Paton, D., J. McClure, and P. T. Büergelt. 2006. “Natural hazard resilience: The role of individual and household preparedness.” In Disaster resilience: An integrated approach, 105–127. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher.
Peacock, W. G., S. Van Zandt, Y. Zhang, and W. E. Highfield. 2014. “Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 80 (4): 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.980440.
Rasoulkhani, K., and A. Mostafavi. 2018. “Resilience as an emergent property of human-infrastructure dynamics: A multi-agent simulation model for characterizing regime shifts and tipping point behaviors in infrastructure systems.” PLoS One 13 (11): e0207674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207674.
Rufat, S., E. Tate, C. G. Burton, and A. S. Maroof. 2015. “Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 14 (Dec): 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.09.013.
Stough, L. M., A. N. Sharp, A. J. Resch, C. Decker, and N. Wilker. 2015. “Barriers to the long-term recovery of individuals with disabilities following a disaster.” Disasters 40 (3): 387–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12161.
Sutley, E. J., J. W. van de Lindt, and L. Peek. 2017. “Community-level framework for seismic resilience. II: Multiobjective optimization and illustrative examples.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 18 (3): 04016015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000230.
Trump, B. D., K. Poinsatte-Jones, M. Elran, C. Allen, B. Srdjevic, M. Merad, D. M. Vasovic, and J. M. P. Palma-Olivera. 2017. “Social resilience and critical infrastructure systems.” In Resilience and risk, 289–299. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
UNISDR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2009. 2009 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.
Westbrook Lauten, A., and K. Lietz. 2008. “A look at the standards gap: Comparing child protection responses in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the Indian Ocean tsunami.” Children Youth Environ. 18 (1): 158–201.
Yoon, D. K. 2012. “Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: A comparative study.” Nat. Hazards 63 (2): 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0189-2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 21 • Issue 4 • November 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 16, 2019
Accepted: Apr 15, 2020
Published online: Jun 18, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 18, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
