Skip to main content

Abstract

The magnitude (Mw) 8.3 Tokachi-oki earthquake occurred in September 2003, causing extensive damage in Hokkaido, Japan, and triggering extensive soil liquefaction in the region. The Port of Kushiro was one of the locations where surficial evidence of liquefaction was observed but was also a well-instrumented location with four pore-water pressure transducers installed in the backfill of the quay wall. However, all of the sensors malfunctioned during the earthquake. As a result, the pore-water pressure response recorded by those sensors were inaccurate and unusable with regard to evaluating liquefaction triggering and extent. This study introduced the energy-based soil liquefaction evaluation to estimate the excess pore water pressure responses at the Port of Kushiro based on the cumulative strain energy of the soil during the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake. In order to apply the energy-based method to this case history, this study explored the empirical equation describing a relationship between normalized cumulative energy and excess pore water pressure ratio while incorporating the bidirectional shaking effect on strain energy development. Although the energy-based method allowed for the estimation of the time needed to trigger liquefaction at a target site, it was derived using the empirical coefficients that were developed for a different soil from those at the site of interest. This indicated that an adjustment to the estimated timing of liquefaction was needed, which was accomplished by additional evaluation through a Stockwell transform and Arias intensity-based liquefaction assessment. Both procedures indicated a similar timing of liquefaction at the site. Based on the updated time of liquefaction triggering, the empirical coefficient was recalibrated to estimate the excess pore water pressure ratio, and the result provided reasonable excess pore water pressure responses at the backfill of the Port of Kushiro during the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Hokkaido Regional Development Bureau, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, Japan, for providing the data used in this study.

References

Bartlett, S. F., and T. L. Youd. 1995. “Empirical prediction of liquefaction-induced lateral spread.” J. Geotech. Eng. 121 (4): 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:4(316).
Boore, D. M. 2010. “Orientation-independent, nongeometric-mean measures of seismic intensity from two horizontal components of motion.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 100 (4): 1830–1835. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090400.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss. 2014. CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures. Davis, CA: Univ. of California.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Eurocode 8—Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. EN 1998-5:2004. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Cetin, K. O., and H. T. Bilge. 2012. “Performance-based assessment of magnitude (duration) scaling factors.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138 (3): 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000596.
Cetin, K. O., and R. B. Seed. 2004. “Nonlinear shear mass participation factor (RD) for cyclic shear stress ratio evaluation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (2): 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.10.008.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, R. E. S. Moss, H. T. Bilge, M. Ilgac, and K. Chowdhury. 2018a. “SPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction triggering hazard.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 115 (Dec): 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.012.
Cetin, K. O., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, R. E. S. Moss, H. T. Bilge, M. Ilgac, and K. Chowdhury. 2018b. “The use of the SPT-based seismic soil liquefaction triggering evaluation methodology in engineering hazard assessments.” MethodsX 5 (Apr): 1556–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2018.11.016.
Davis, R. O., and J. B. Berrill. 1982. “Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction in sands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 10 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100105.
El Shafee, O., T. Abdoun, and M. Zeghal. 2017. “Centrifuge modelling and analysis of site liquefaction subjected to biaxial dynamic excitations.” Géotechnique 67 (3): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.16.P.049.
FEMA. 2009. Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. FEMA 750. Washington, DC: Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building.
Ghaboussi, J., and S. U. Dikmen. 1981. “Liquefaction analysis for multidirectional shaking.” J. Geotech. Eng. 107 (5): 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001133.
Green, R. A. 2001. “Energy-based evaluation and remediation of liquefiable soils.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech.
Groholski, D. R., Y. M. A. Hashash, B. Kim, M. Musgrove, J. Harmon, and J. P. Stewart. 2016. “Simplified model for small-strain nonlinearity and strength in 1D seismic response analysis.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (9): 04016042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001496.
Hashash, Y. M. A., M. I. Musgrove, J. A. Harmon, O. Ilhan, G. Xing, O. Numanoglu, D. R. Groholski, C. A. Phillips, and D. Park. 2020. DEEPSOIL 7, user manual. Urbana, IL: Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Idriss, I. M., and R. W. Boulanger. 2010. SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures.. Davis, CA: Univ. of California at Davis.
Ishihara, K., and Y. Koga. 1981. “Case studies of liquefaction in the 1964 Niigata earthquake.” Soils Found. 21 (3): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.21.3_35.
Jafarian, Y., I. Towhata, M. H. Baziar, A. Noorzad, and A. Bahmanpour. 2012. “Strain energy based evaluation of liquefaction and residual pore water pressure in sands using cyclic torsional shear experiments.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 35 (Sep): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.006.
Jin, H., and L. Guo. 2021. “Effect of phase difference on the liquefaction behavior of sand in multidirectional simple shear tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (12): 06021015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002703.
Kayen, R. E., and J. K. Mitchell. 1997. “Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 123 (12): 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:12(1162).
Kayen, R. E., R. E. S. Moss, E. M. Thompson, R. B. Seed, K. O. Cetin, A. Der Kiureghian, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tokimatsu. 2013. “Shear-wave velocity–based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139 (3): 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743.
Kim, H. S., M. Kim, L. G. Baise, and B. Kim. 2021. “Local and regional evaluation of liquefaction potential index and liquefaction severity number for liquefaction-induced sand boils in Pohang, South Korea.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 141 (Aug): 106459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106459.
Ko, K. W., and R. E. Kayen. 2024. “Energy-based and strain-based methods for estimation of pore water pressure within liquefied soil layers.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK/GTENG-11458.
Kokusho, T. 2013. “Liquefaction potential evaluations: Energy-based method versus stress-based method.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (10): 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0456.
Kokusho, T. 2017. Innovative earthquake soil dynamics. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis.
Kokusho, T. 2021. “Energy–based liquefaction evaluation for induced strain and surface settlement—Evaluation steps and case studies.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 143 (Feb): 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106552.
Kokusho, T., and Y. Kaneko. 2018. “Energy evaluation for liquefaction-induced strain of loose sands by harmonic and irregular loading tests.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114 (Jun): 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.012.
Kokusho, T., and S. Tanimoto. 2021. “Energy capacity versus liquefaction strength investigated by cyclic triaxial tests on intact soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (4): 04021006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002484.
Kostadinov, M. V., and F. Yamazaki. 2001. “Detection of soil liquefaction from strong motion records.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30 (2): 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200102)30:2%3C173::AID-EQE3%3E3.0.CO;2-7.
Koyamada, K., Y. Miyamoto, and K. Tokimatsu. 2006. “Field investigation and analysis study of damaged pile foundation during the 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake.” In Proc., Seismic Performance and Simulation of Pile Foundations in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground, 97–108. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40822(184)9.
Kramer, S. L., S. S. Sideras, and M. W. Greenfield. 2016. “The timing of liquefaction and its utility in liquefaction hazard evaluation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 91 (Dec): 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.025.
Millen, M. D. L., A. Viana da Fonseca, and C. M. Azeredo. 2021. “Time–frequency filter for computation of surface acceleration for liquefiable sites: Equivalent linear Stockwell analysis method.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 147 (8): 04021070. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002581.
Moss, R. E., R. B. Seed, R. E. Kayen, J. P. Stewart, A. Der Kiureghian, and K. O. Cetin. 2006. “CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (8): 1032–1051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:8(1032).
Nemat-Nasser, S., and A. Shokooh. 1979. “A unified approach to densification and liquefaction of cohesionless sand in cyclic shearing.” Can. Geotech. J. 16 (4): 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1139/t79-076.
Özener, P. T., M. W. Greenfield, S. S. Sideras, and S. L. Kramer. 2020. “Identification of time of liquefaction triggering.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 128 (Jan): 105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105895.
Polito, C., R. A. Green, E. Dillon, and C. Sohn. 2013. “Effect of load shape on relationship between dissipated energy and residual excess pore pressure generation in cyclic triaxial tests.” Can. Geotech. J. 50 (11): 1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0379.
Polito, C. P. 2017. “Constant-volume cyclic testing to determine input parameters for the GMP pore pressure generation model.” In Geotechnical Frontiers 2017, 71–79. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480489.008.
Polito, C. P., R. A. Green, and J. Lee. 2008. “Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 134 (10): 1490–1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490).
Sasajima, T., A. Kubouchi, K. Miura, N. Otuka, and E. Kohama. 2004. “A project for the field observation of seismic behavior of full-sized test gravity type quay wall.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–6. Vancouver, BC, Canada: WCEE Secretariat.
Sasajima, T., K. Miura, A. Kubouchi, N. Otsuka, E. Kohama, and J. Watanabe. 2005. “Liquefaction induced deformation of test quay wall in Kushiro Port during the 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake.” In Proc., Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, 1–15. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40779(158)15.
Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
Seed, H. B., G. R. Martin, and R. M. Pyke. 1978. “Effect of multidirectional shaking on pore pressure development in sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. 104 (1): 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000575.
Seed, H. B., K. Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, and R. M. Chung. 1985. “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations.” J. Geotech. Eng. 111 (12): 1425–1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425).
Su, D., and X. S. Li. 2008. “Impact of multidirectional shaking on liquefaction potential of level sand deposits.” Géotechnique 58 (4): 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.4.259.
Towhata, I., and K. Ishihara. 1985. “Shear work and pore water pressure in undrained shear.” Soils Found. 25 (3): 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.25.3_73.
Unjoh, S., M. Kaneko, S. Kataoka, K. Nagaya, and K. Matsuoka. 2012. “Effect of earthquake ground motions on soil liquefaction.” Soils Found. 52 (5): 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.006.
Vucetic, M., and R. Dobry. 1986. Pore pressure build-up and liquefaction at level sandy sites during earthquakes. Troy, NY: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Yamaguchi, A., T. Mori, M. Kazama, and N. Yoshida. 2012. “Liquefaction in Tohoku district during the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake.” Soils Found. 52 (5): 811–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.11.005.
Yamashita, S., Y. Ito, T. Hori, T. Suzuki, and Y. Murata. 2005. “Geotechnical properties of liquefied volcanic soil ground by 2003 Tokachi-Oki earthquake.” In Proc., 16th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2737–2740. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
Youd, T. L., and I. M. Idriss. 2001. “Liquefaction resistance of soils: Summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998  NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (10): 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297).
Zeghal, M., et al. 2018. “Stress–strain response of the LEAP-2015 centrifuge tests and numerical predictions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 113 (Oct): 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.10.014.
Zhang, J., T. Wang, S. Xiao, and L. Gao. 2021. “Chinese code methods for liquefaction potential assessment based on standard penetration test: An extension.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 144 (Feb): 106697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106697.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
Volume 150Issue 10October 2024

History

Received: Jun 2, 2023
Accepted: Apr 23, 2024
Published online: Jul 23, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 23, 2024

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5916-4227. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0356-072X. Email: [email protected]
Takaji Kokusho [email protected]
Emeritus Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chuo Univ., 46-5-1504 Senju-Asahicho, Adachi-ku, Tokyo 120-0026, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3459-2361. Email: [email protected]
Atsushi Nozu [email protected]
Director, Dept. of Earthquake Disaster Prevention Engineering, Port and Airport Research Institute, 3-1-1 Nagase, Yokosuka 239-0826, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Chukwuebuka C. Nweke, M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2531. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Predicting strain energy causing soil liquefaction, Transportation Geotechnics, 10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101419, 49, (101419), (2024).

View Options

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share