Runoff Prediction in Small Rivers Using Dynamic Parameter Fitting with Observed Rainfall Data
Publication: Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 5
Abstract
Floods in a small river basin measuring a few square kilometers can sometimes cause the water levels to rise more than 1 m within 10 min. Therefore, the importance of runoff prediction within tens of minutes is greater in small rivers than in large ones. In this study, we developed a runoff prediction method that uses only observed rain by considering the lag time, representing the time from rainfall to runoff, as prediction lead time. The developed prediction method (DSG) employed the Storage Function model for the runoff simulation and a Genetic Algorithm (GA) for dynamically automatic parameter fitting that was performed in each time step of a rain event. The DSG was applied to six heavy rain events that caused flooding in the Kohatsu River in Japan from 2020 to 2022. The simulation results showed that the GA could effectively determine the optimal parameters to ensure that past simulation depths agreed with the observed ones at each time step of the simulation. Prediction results of the DSG were compared with those of the Storage Function Model with static pre-calibrated parameters (SSG), the simple persistence model (SP), and the gradient persistence model (GP) used as benchmarks. The prediction results of the developed model had the slightest total error of the water level hydrograph (Average ) compared to the predictions of the SSG, SP, and GP models across all six heavy rain events. In addition, the coefficient of determination for the flow depth prediction using the developed method (DSG) was higher than 0.9 for each rain event.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
DIAS (Data Integration and Analysis System). n.d. “Rainfall data and dataset search.” Accessed October 11, 2022. https://diasjp.net/en/.
Ghimire, G. R., and W. F. Krajewski. 2020. “Exploring persistence in streamflow forecasting.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 56 (3): 542–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12821.
Ghimire, G. R., W. F. Krajewski, and F. Quintero. 2021. “Scale-dependent value of QPF for real-time streamflow forecasting.” J. Hydrometeorol. 22 (7): 1931–1947. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-20-0297.1.
Holland, J. H. 1992. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: An introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Khu, S. T. 2001. “Genetic programming and its application in real-time runoff forecasting.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37 (2): 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb00980.x.
Kimura, T. 1961. The flood runoff analysis method by the storage function model. Tsukuba, Japan: Public Works Research Institute, Ministry of Construction.
Krausse, T., and J. Cullmann. 2009. “Towards robust estimation of hydrological parameters focusing on flood forecasting in small catchments.” In Proc., 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns. Brussels, Belgium: International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation.
Kumar, M. 2010. “Genetic algorithm: Review and application.” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Knowl. Manage. 2 (Dec): 451–454. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3529843.
Moriasi, D. N., M. W. Gutau, N. Pai, and P. Daggupati. 2015. “Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria.” Trans. ASABE 58 (6): 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715.
Paik, K., J. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, and D. R. Lee. 2005. “A conceptual rainfall-runoff model considering seasonal variation.” Hydrol. Processes 19 (19): 3837–3850. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5984.
Park, M., J. Jung, H. Joo, Y. Kim, J. Kwak, J. Kim, C. Choi, and H. S. Kim. 2021. “A synthetic equation for storage function model parameter estimation based on kinematic wave approximation.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 66 (3): 544–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1877707.
Sedki, A., O. Driss, and E. E. Mazoudi. 2009. “Evolving neural network using real coded genetic algorithm for daily rainfall–runoff forecasting.” Expert Syst. Appl. 36 (3): 4523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.05.024.
Sugiyama, H., M. Kadoya, A. Nagai, and K. Lansey. 1997. “Evaluation of the storage function model parameter characteristics.” J. Hydrol. 191 (1): 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(96)03026-0.
Vivoni, E. R., D. Entekhabi, R. L. Bras, V. Y. Ivanov, and M. P. Van Horne. 2006. “Extending the predictability of hydrometeorological flood events using radar rainfall nowcasting.” J. Hydrometeorol. 7 (4): 660–677. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM514.1.
Wang, Q. J. 1991. “The genetic algorithm and its application to calibrating conceptual rainfall-runoff models.” Water Resour. Res. 27 (9): 2467–2471. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01305.
Wu, C. L., and W. C. Kwok. 2006. “A flood forecasting neural network model with genetic algorithm.” Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 28 (3–4): 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2006.011211.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 2, 2023
Accepted: Apr 9, 2024
Published online: Jul 3, 2024
Published in print: Oct 1, 2024
Discussion open until: Dec 3, 2024
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.