Practicality of Driven Parameters of Semicircular Bending Test at Intermediate Temperature
Publication: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 147, Issue 3
Abstract
The semicircular bending (SCB) test characterizes crack resistance by determining the fracture toughness of asphalt mixtures. This test has been favored by many researchers due to the easy sample preparation and the simplified analysis. This study investigates asphalt mixtures in Utah by evaluating repeatability and reproducibility of the SCB test. A multilaboratory study consisting of both laboratory and field samples was conducted. Based on statistical results from the laboratory study, around 20% difference is conservatively enough to consider the FI average of one material different from the FI average of another material. Based on the field study results obtained from actual field projects, the range of FI results has been evaluated by the impact of driven parameters. The SCB test is capable of distinguishing between different mixtures showing that a threshold FI value between 6 and 8 could discern improper mixtures due to low binder content or any other material design deficiency. This concept can also be implemented as a quality control tool to supervise contractors. All in all, the SCB test procedure appears to be a potential crack propagation assessment candidate for fatigue resistance index. Implementation of this test is a promising tool for agencies and departments of transportation as a performance base design criterion.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data is accessible at the following links: [Data set] Pedro Romero. (2019). Evaluation of Materials for Asphalt Mixture Performance, Semi-Circular Bend Laboratory Tests (version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2565717 [Data set] Pedro Romero. (2019). Evaluation of Materials for Asphalt Mixture Performance, Semi-Circular Bend Field Material (version 1). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2574183.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the help of Clark Allen and Mike White, from the Utah DOT and Michael VanMilligen from PEPG Transportation Engineering Group who assisted in the testing of the samples. Funding was provided by the Utah DOT. Mr. Shuangli Bao helped during sample preparation phases of the study.
References
AASHTO. 2013. Standard method of test for determining the fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the semicircular bend geometry (SCB). AASHTO TP 105. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2016. Standard method of test for determining the fracture potential of asphalt mixtures using semicircular bend geometry (SCB) at intermediate temperature. AASHTO TP 124. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Al-Qadi, I. L., H. Ozer, J. Lambros, A. El Khatib, P. Singhvi, T. Khan, J. Rivera-Perez, and B. Doll. 2015. “Testing protocols to ensure performance of high asphalt binder replacement mixes using RAP and RAS. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois DOT.
Arabani, M., and B. Ferdowsi. 2009. “Evaluating the semi-circular bending test for HMA mixtures.” Int. J. Eng. Trans. A 22 (1): 47–58.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for evaluation of asphalt mixture cracking resistance using the semi-circular bend test (SCB) at intermediate temperatures. ASTM D8044-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2010. Bituminous mixtures—Test methods for hot mix asphalt part 44: Crack propagation by semi-circular bending test. EN 12697-44. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chong, K., and M. Kuruppu. 1984. “New specimen for fracture toughness determination for rock and other materials.” Int. J. Fract. 26 (2): R59–R62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01157555.
Hofman, R., B. Oosterbaan, S. Erkens, and J. van der Kooij. 2003. “Semi-circular bending test to assess the resistance against crack growth.” In Proc., 6th RILEM Symp. on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials, 257–263. Paris: RILEM Publications.
Hopkins, K. D., and D. L. Weeks. 1990. “Tests for normality and measures of skewness and kurtosis: Their place in research reporting.” Educ. Psychol. Meas. 50 (4): 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490504001.
Huang, B., X. Shu, and G. Zuo. 2013. “Using notched semi circular bending fatigue test to characterize fracture resistance of asphalt mixtures.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 109 (Sep): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.07.003.
Jahanbakhsh, H., M. M. Karimi, and N. Tabatabaee. 2017. “Experimental and numerical in- vestigation of low-temperature performance of modified asphalt binders and mixtures.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (6): 1353–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1220864.
Krans, R., F. Tolman, and M. Van de Ven. 1996. “Semi-circular bending test: A practical crack growth test using asphalt concrete cores.” In Proc., 3rd Int. RILEM Conf. on Reflective Cracking in Pavements, 123–132. London: Chapman & Hall.
Lehmann, E. L., G. Casella, and G. Casella. 1991. Vol. 16 of Theory of point estimation: Wadsworth & brooks, 24–25. Pacific Grove, CA: Cole Advanced Books and Software.
Marasteanu, M., et al. 2007. Investigation of low temperature cracking in asphalt pavements national pooled fund study 776. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota DOT.
Mohammad, L., Z. Wu, and M. Aglan. 2004. “Characterization of fracture and fatigue resistance on recycled polymer-modified asphalt pavements.” In Proc., 5th RILEM Int. Conf. on Cracking in Pavements, 5–8. Paris: RILEM Publications.
Mohammad, L. N., M. Kim, and M. Elseifi. 2012. “Characterization of asphalt mixture’s fracture resistance using the semi-circular bending (SCB) test.” In Proc., 7th RILEM Int. Conf. on Cracking in Pavements, 1–10. New York: Springer.
Mohammad, L. N., M. A. Mull-Aglan, and A. Othman. 2006. “Fatigue crack growth analysis of hot-mix asphalt employing semicircular notched bend specimen.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Molenaar, A., A. Scarpas, X. Liu, and S. Erkens. 2002. “Semi-circular bending test; simple but useful?” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 71: 794–815.
Mull, M., K. Stuart, and A. Yehia. 2002. “Fracture resistance characterization of chemically modified crumb rubber asphalt pavement.” J. Mater. Sci. 37 (3): 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013721708572.
Nsengiyumva, G., T. You, and Y. R. Kim. 2017. “Experimental-statistical investigation of testing variables of a semicircular bending (SCB) fracture test repeatability for bituminous mixtures.” J. Test. Eval. 45 (5): 1691–1701.
Ouchterlony, F. 1990. “Fracture toughness testing of rock with core based specimens.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 35 (1): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(90)90214-2.
Ozer, H., I. L. Al-Qadi, E. Barber, E. Okte, Z. Zhu, and S. Wu. 2017. Evaluation of i-fit results and machine variability using mnroad test track mixtures. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois DOT.
Romero, P., C. H. Ho, and K. VanFrank. 2011. Development of methods to control cold temperature and fatigue cracking for asphalt mixtures. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT Research Division.
Romero, P., and K. VanFrank. 2017. Balanced asphalt concrete mix performance phase II: Analysis of BBR and SCB tests. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT Submitted, Univ. of Utah.
Salkind, N. J., and B. B. Frey. 2019. Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Seo, S. 2006. “A review and comparison of methods for detecting outliers in univariate data sets.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, Univ. of Pittsburgh.
VanFrank, K., M. VanMilligen, and T. Biel. 2017. Intermediate temperature cracking in HMA; phase I semi-circular bending (SCB) practicality evaluation. Salt Lake City, UT: Utah DOT.
Wang, H., C. Zhang, L. Li, Z. You, and A. Diab. 2016. “Characterization of low temperature crack resistance of crumb rubber modified asphalt mixtures using semi-circular bending tests.” J. Test. Eval. 44 (2): 847–855.
Zofka, A., and A. Braham. 2009. “Comparison of low-temperature field performance and laboratory testing of 10 test sections in the Midwestern United States.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2127 (1): 107–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2127-13.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements
Volume 147 • Issue 3 • September 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 25, 2020
Accepted: Feb 27, 2021
Published online: Jun 3, 2021
Published in print: Sep 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.