Identifying Weak Joints in Jointed Concrete and Composite Pavements from Traffic Speed Deflectometer Measurements by Basis Pursuit
Publication: Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 2
Abstract
Weak joints are the source of most performance problems in jointed concrete pavements (JPCPs) and composite pavements created by overlaying a JPCP. Until recently, it has been prohibitively time-consuming to evaluate the joints in a road network, and the evaluation of joint load transfer efficiency (LTE) has been restricted to specific project-level applications. This is changing with the advent of the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD), a device that can collect structural information data at a 1-m resolution while moving at traffic speed. The 1-m resolution is adequate to capture the response of the joints to the applied load, but it results in a higher noise level compared with data collected at lower resolutions (e.g., at the typical 10 m). This paper proposes the use of basis pursuit (BP) denoising to extract meaningful information about the joints’ condition from the (noisy) TSD measurements. Weak joints are modeled as spikes (Dirac basis) in the measurements, and the remaining features in the measurements are modeled on a wavelet basis. Combining the two bases (Dirac basis and wavelet basis) results in multiple possible representations of the collected measurements; essentially there are twice as many unknowns as equations to determine these unknowns. BP denoising seeks a representation with a small number of elements from the two bases. Because weak joints are represented best by spikes, BP denoising results mostly in selecting the spikes at the weak joint locations. These identified spikes provide a list of weak joints that can be used to prioritize available resources (e.g., which joints should be investigated further or fixed first). We present examples of BP denoising using simulated data and actual TSD collected data.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original TSD data used in this study and the computer code written to perform the calculations that support the findings presented herein are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
AASHTO. 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. A manual of practice. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Alavi, S., J. F. LeCates, and M. P. Tavares. 2008. Falling weight deflectometer usage. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Arora, J., V. Tandon, and S. Nazarian. 2006. Continuous deflection testing of highways at traffic speeds. El Paso, TX: Univ. of Texas at El Paso.
Austroads. 2016. Pavement data collection with a traffic speed deflectometer (TSD) device. Sydney, Australia: Austroads.
Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and L. Wang. 2011. “Square-root lasso: pivotal recovery of sparse signals via conic programming.” Biometrika 98 (4): 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asr043.
Belloni, A., V. Chernozhukov, and L. Wang. 2014. “Pivotal estimation via square-root Lasso in nonparametric regression.” Ann. Stat. 42 (2): 757–788. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-AOS1204.
Candès, E. J., J. Romberg, and T. Tao. 2006. “Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52 (2): 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.862083.
Chen, S. S., D. L. Donoho, and M. A. Saunders. 2001. “Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit.” SIAM Rev. 43 (1): 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614450037906X.
Donoho, D. L. 2006. “Compressed sensing.” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52 (4): 1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2006.871582.
Donoho, D. L., and J. M. Johnstone. 1994. “Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage.” Biometrika 81 (3): 425–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.425.
Efron, B., T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani. 2004. “Least angle regression.” Ann. Stat. 32 (2): 407–499. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000067.
Elseifi, M. A., and Z. U. A. Zihan. 2018. Assessment of the traffic speed deflectometer in Louisiana for pavement structural evaluation. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana State Univ.
European Commission Directorate General Transport. 1997. COST Action 325. New road monitoring equipment and methods. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Ferne, B. W., S. Drusin, S. Baltzer, P. Langdale, and B. Meitei. 2015. “UK trial to compare 1st and 2nd generation traffic speed deflectometers.” In Proc., Int. Symp. Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE). Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. “Highway statistics 2018.” Accessed November 8, 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2018/.
Flintsch, G. W., S. W. Katicha, J. Bryce, B. Ferne, S. Nell, and B. Diefenderfer. 2013. Assessment of continuous pavement deflection measuring technologies. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2010. “Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent.” J. Stat. Software 33 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01.
Haas, R., W. R. Hudson, and L. C. Falls. 2015. Pavement asset management. 1st ed. Beverly, MA: Scrivener.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. 2009. The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer series in statistics. New York: Springer.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright. 2015. Statistical learning with sparsity. The lasso and generalizations. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 143. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hildebrand, G., and S. Rasmussen. 2002. Development of a high-speed deflectograph. Roskilde, Denmark: Road Directorate, Danish Road Institute.
Huang, Y. H. 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Javanmard, A., and A. Montanari. 2018. “Debiasing the lasso: Optimal sample size for Gaussian designs.” Ann. Stat. 46 (6A): 2593–2622. https://doi.org/10.1214/17-AOS1630.
Katicha, S. W., J. Bryce, G. Flintsch, and B. Ferne. 2015. “Estimating ‘true’ variability of traffic speed deflectometer deflection slope measurements.” J. Transp. Eng. 141 (1): 04014071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000711.
Katicha, S. W., G. W. Flintsch, J. Bryce, and B. Ferne. 2014a. “Wavelet denoising of TSD deflection slope measurements for improved pavement structural evaluation.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 29 (6): 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12052.
Katicha, S. W., G. W. Flintsch, and B. Ferne. 2013. “Optimal averaging and localized weak spot identification of traffic speed deflectometer measurements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2367 (1): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3141/2367-05.
Katicha, S. W., G. W. Flintsch, B. Ferne, and J. Bryce. 2014b. “Limits of agreement method for comparing TSD and FWD measurements.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (6): 532–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.782403.
Katicha, S. W., G. W. Flintsch, S. Shrestha, and S. Thyagarajan. 2017. Demonstration of network level pavement structural evaluation with traffic speed deflectometer: Final report. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.
Katicha, S. W., A. Loulizi, J. El Khouri, and G. W. Flintsch. 2016. “Adaptive false discovery rate for wavelet denoising of pavement continuous deflection measurements.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 31 (2): 04016049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000603.
Mallat, S. 2008. A wavelet tour of signal processing: The sparse way. 3rd ed. Burlington, VT: Academic Press.
Mazumder, R., J. H. Friedman, and T. Hastie. 2011. “SparseNet: Coordinate descent with nonconvex penalties.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106 (495): 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09738.
Park, T., and G. Casella. 2008. “The Bayesian Lasso.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103 (482): 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000337.
Penrose, R. 1955. “A generalized inverse for matrices.” In Vol. 51 of Proc., Mathematical: Cambridge Philosophical Society, 406–413. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Penrose, R. 1956. “On best approximate solutions of linear matrix equations.” In Vol. 52 of Proc., Mathematical: Cambridge Philosophical Society, 17–19. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
PIARC (Permanent International Association of Road Congresses). 2017. “Asset management manual. A guide for practitioners!.” Accessed October 22, 2019. https://road-asset.piarc.org/en.
Pierce, L., J. E. Bruinsma, K. D. Smith, M. J. Wade, K. Chatti, and J. M. Vandenbossche. 2017. Using falling weight deflectometer data with mechanistic-empirical design and analysis, volume III: Guidelines for deflection testing, analysis, and interpretation. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Pierce, L., J. Uhlmeyer, J. Weston, J. Lovejoy, and J. P. Mahoney. 2003. “Ten-year performance of dowel-bar retrofit: Application, performance, and lessons learned.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1853 (1): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-10.
Rada, G., S. Nazarian, B. A. Visintine, R. Siddhartan, and S. Thyagarajan. 2016. Pavement structural evaluation at the network level: Final report. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Simonin, J. M., D. Lièvre, S. Rasmussen, and G. Hildebrand. 2005. “Assessment of the Danish high-speed deflectograph in France.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields. Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian Univ. for Science and Technology.
Stein, C. M. 1981. “Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution.” Ann. Stat. 1135–1151. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345632.
Tibshirani, R. 1996. “Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso.” J. Royal Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 58 (1): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x.
Zou, H., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. 2007. “On the 'degrees of freedom’ of the Lasso.” Ann. Stat. 35 (5): 2173–2192.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 26, 2020
Accepted: Sep 16, 2020
Published online: Nov 27, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Apr 27, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.