What Should Be the 95th Percentile Rainfall Event Depths?
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 140, Issue 1
Abstract
Based on Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) published a report providing technical guidance that recommends using the 95th percentile rainfall event for federal development or redevelopment projects to preserve or restore predevelopment hydrology of the site. In this study, the 95th percentile rainfall depths using daily rainfall data were computed following the USEPA guidelines from 18 selected weather stations. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the 95th percentile daily rainfall depths truly represent the 95th percentile event rainfall depths. For analysis, the 95th percentile event rainfall depths were computed using hourly rainfall data for storm events separated by minimum interevent dry periods of 6, 8, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72-h and compared with the 95th percentile daily rainfall depths. The 95th percentile event rainfall depths calculated using minimum interevent dry periods of 6–72 h are on average 11–100% greater than the 95th percentile daily rainfall depths recorded at 18 selected weather stations.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank three anonymous reviewers who provided the comments to improve the paper.
References
Arnell, V. (1982). “Rainfall data for the design of sewer pipe systems.”, Dept. of Hydraulics, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Asquith, W. H., Roussel, M. C., Cleveland, T. G., Fang, X., and Thompson, D. B. (2006). “Statistical characteristics of storm interevent time, depth, and duration for eastern New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.”, U.S. Geological Survey, Texas Water Science Center, Austin, TX.
Brown, R. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2011). “Evaluating media depth, surface storage volume, and presence of an internal water storage zone on four sets of bioretension cells in North Carolina.” 2011 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, R. E. Beighley II and M. W. Killgore, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Driscoll, E. D., Palhegyi, G. E., Strecker, E. W., and Shelley, P. E. (1989). Analysis of storm event characteristics for selected rainfall gages throughout the United States, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Haubner, S., Reese, A., Brown, T., Claytor, R., and Debo, T. (2001). “Georgia stormwater management manual: Volume 2 technical handbook.” 〈http://www.atlantaregional.com/environment/georgia-stormwater-manual〉 (Jul. 26, 2012).
Hershfield, D. M. (1963). “Rainfall frequency atlas of the United States for durations from 30 minutes to 24 hours and return periods from 1 to 100 years.”, U.S. Weather Bureau, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC.
Hvitved-Jacobson, T. H., and Yousef, Y. A. (1988). “Analysis of rainfall series in the design of urban drainage control systems.” Water Res., 22(4), 491–496.
Hydrosphere. (2003). “NCDC hourly preceipitation-West.” (CD-ROM) Hydrosphere Data Products Inc., V. 13.2, Boulder, CO.
Iowa State Univ. (ISU). (2009). “Stormwater hydrology.” Iowa Stormwater Management Manual, Ames, IA. 〈http://www.intrans.iastate.edu/publications/posts/?publication=stormwater-management-manual〉 (Jul. 26, 2012).
Li, M.-H., and Barrett, M. E. (2008). “Relationship between antecedent dry period and highway pollutant: Conceptual models of buildup and removal processes.” Water Environ. Res., 80(8), 740–747.
National Research Council (NRC). (2008). “Urban stormwater management in the United States.” The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
New York State Dept. of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC). (2001). “Unified stormwater sizing criteria.” New York Stormwater Management Design Manual, Albany, NY. 〈http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/29072.html〉 (Nov. 6, 2011).
NIST/SEMATECH. (2010). “Product and process comparison.” E-handbook of statistical methods, 〈http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/〉 (Aug. 20, 2011).
Riverside County. (2004). “Water quality management plan for urban runoff.” Storm Water Clean Water Protection Program, Riverside County, CA.
Shaver, E., Horner, R., Skupien, J., May, C., and Ridley, C. (2007). “Fundamentals of urban runoff management technical and institutional issues.” 2nd Ed., North American Lake Management Society, Madison, WI.
Shrestha, S., Fang, X., and Li, J. (2013). “Mapping the 95th percentile daily rainfall in the contiguous U.S.” World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2013: Showcasing the Future, ASCE, Reston, VA.
USEPA. (1986). “Methodology for analysis of detention basins for control of urban runoff quality.”, Washington DC.
USEPA. (2009). “Technical guidance on implementing the stormwater runoff requirements for federal projects under Section 438 of the Energy Independence and Security Act.”, Washington, DC.
Viessman, W., and Lewis, G. L. (2003). Introduction to hydrology, 5th Ed., Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wanielista, M. P., and Yousef, Y. A. (1993). Stormwater management, Wiley, New York.
Wenzel, H. G., and Voorhees, M. L. (1981). “An evaluation of the urban design storm concept.”, Water Resource Center, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Williardson, B., and Walden, A. (2004). “Analysis of 85th percentile 24-hour rainfall depths within the County of Los Angeles.” Water Resources Division/Hydrology Section, Dept. of Public Works, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 1, 2012
Accepted: Jul 29, 2013
Published online: Aug 1, 2013
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.