PEER-REVIEWED PAPER: Partnering Continuum
Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 14, Issue 5
Abstract
Numerous publications have documented successes achieved through partnering. Such notable results have been achieved over a wide variety of applications, including public and private ownership, single-project and multiple-project agreements, and lump-sum and cost-plus contracts. Such accomplishment across a spectrum of application suggests that partnering, if applied properly, can work in almost any environment. Recent research by the Construction Industry Institute highlights this fact that many “shades” of partnering exist, based on the degree of objectives alignment between involved parties. To illustrate this, a partnering continuum has been developed, depicting four general stages—competition, cooperation, collaboration, and coalescence. “Competition” represents the traditional owner/contractor relationship, where each party possesses separate objectives, and minimal effort is expended toward “working together.” This competitive pursuit occurs in the absence of partnering. The other three stages—cooperation, collaboration, and coalescence—incorporate increasing degrees of objective alignment and commitment by the involved parties, and are represented on the continuum to depict various partnering applications. Companies considering partnering should assess their business objectives, analyze the role of partnering in helping them to achieve those objectives, and determine the appropriate style of partnering to implement. Through this process, a balance can be struck between risk and reward, and resources can be properly utilized to develop, implement, and manage the partnering relationship.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Brown, J. H.(1993). “Partnering on engineering/construction projects.”PM Network, 7(12), 32–34.
2.
Cohen, A. R., Fink, S. L., Gadon, H., and Willits, R. D. (1995). Effective behavior in organizations. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., Chicago. In search of partnering excellence . (1991). CII Publ. 17-1. Bureau of Engrg. Res., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
3.
Larson, E. (1995). “Project partnering: Results of study of 280 construction projects.”J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 11(2), 30–35. The partnering process—Its benefits, implementation, and measurement . (1996). CII Source Document 102-11. Bureau of Engrg. Res., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
4.
Sanders, S. R., and Moore, M. M.(1992). “Perceptions on partnering in the public sector.”Proj. Mgmt. J., 23(4), 13–19.
5.
“Team building/partnering: Public sector.” (1995). CII Conf., Bureau of Engrg. Res., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Tex.
6.
Weston, D. C., and Gibson, G. E. Jr.(1993). “Partnering-project performance in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.”J. Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 9(4), 410–25.
7.
Zand, D. E.(1972). “Trust and managerial problem solving.”Administrative Sci. Quarterly, 17(2), 229–239.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1998
Published in print: Sep 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.