In this paper, efficiency and effectiveness of textile-reinforced mortars (TRM) on upgrading the shear strength and ductility of a seismically deficient exterior beam-column joint has been studied. The results are then compared with that of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)-strengthened joint specimens. Five as-built joint specimens were constructed with nonoptimal design parameters (inadequate joint shear strength with no transverse reinforcement) representing an extreme case of preseismic code design construction practice of joints and encompassing the vast majority of existing beam-column connections. Out of these five as-built specimens, two specimens were used as baseline specimens (control specimens) and the other three were strengthened with TRM, CFRP, and GFRP sheets, respectively. All five subassemblages were subjected to quasi-static cyclic lateral load histories to provide the equivalent of severe earthquake damage. The response histories of control and strengthened specimens were then compared. The test results demonstrated that TRM can effectively improve both the shear strength and deformation capacity of seismically deficient beam-column joints to an extent that is comparable to the strength and ductility achieved by well-established CFRP, and GFRP-strengthening of joints.
Textile-Reinforced Mortar versus FRP as Strengthening Material for Seismically Deficient RC Beam-Column Joints
Downloaded 702 times
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Textile-Reinforced Mortar versus FRP as Strengthening Material for Seismically Deficient RC Beam-Column Joints
Abstract
Journal of Composites for ConstructionNovember 2013
Journal of Composites for ConstructionFebruary 2012
Journal of Composites for ConstructionDecember 2007
Journal of Structural EngineeringJune 2009
Journal of Structural EngineeringSeptember 2009
Authors
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia (corresponding author). E-mail: nadeem@ksu.edu.sa
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
MS Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia.
Received: November 02, 2010
Accepted: April 12, 2011
Published online: April 14, 2011
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers
